Petroleum Rules the World: We Control
Most of It
American Thinker,
by
Clarice Feldman
Original Article
Posted By: Mercedes44,
4/19/2026 5:28:32 AM
Despite the best efforts of those who would utilize the preposterous climate change scare to control us and depopulate the world, petroleum still rules world economies. About 80% of all world energy is petro based -- it fuels industrial and agricultural production along with transportation. Constricting supplies causes all prices to rise -- the inflationary effects are well-known (except perhaps to the bright thinkers promoting net zero policies which are tanking their economies and immiserating their citizens). For this reason, foreign policy strategists, media pundits, and governments who listened to them for decades avoided attacking Iran, fearing worldwide disruption of a critical supply.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 4/19/2026 5:53:34 AM (No. 2094443)
Europe should be made to pay for all the “freebies” they got from the USA over many decades. If they don’t like it, let them do business with Russia.
16 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
cThree 4/19/2026 5:53:55 AM (No. 2094444)
Not only do we have the lion's share of petroleum under our control, Ms Feldman notes from another source, [I]n just over a year, the United States has fully controlled the world's four major maritime chokepoints: Gibraltar Malacca Hormuz Panama I don't need to spell it out -- everyone can see this is a carefully orchestrated strategy, and it feels a bit more reliable than the Belt and Road Initiative.[/I]
Clueless critics like Tampon Tim, KY Gov. Andy Bashear and Maine's neo-Nazi senate candidate Graham Platner continue to call Trump clueless and stupid, preaching to a shrinking audience of the clueless and stupid.
Ms Feldman says of Iran, Unconditional surrender remains their only option now, as we have made clear.
She closes with a promising note about ongoing negotiations in Cuba and the impending prosecution of Russiagate fraudsters.
My only disagreement with Ms Feldman is her choice of words which are far too generous to our media collaborationists, they all fell for the Russiagate ruse. That implies they were victims. They were not.
They were dishonest promoters of the hoax and deserve no slack. The NY Times building, for example, needs to be turned into a parking garage.
28 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
bpl40 4/19/2026 7:52:38 AM (No. 2094466)
There is only one kingdom that is based on Truth, Peace & Justice. And that is the Kingdom of God. Kingdoms in this world run on oil. And that oil is the Middle East. All Geopolitics will always revolve around this fact.
3 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
JHHolliday 4/19/2026 8:28:28 AM (No. 2094480)
"The NY Times building, for example, needs to be turned into a parking garage". Please include the UN Building with it and send the delegates back to their home countries. They certainly won't like giving up their posh sinecures and having to get real jobs.
9 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 4/19/2026 9:06:13 AM (No. 2094505)
What an uplifting article. With a little luck, a lot of the Iran idiocracy should be over before the midterms and the economy should bounce back. The Russiagate prosecutions probably won't be done by then but the culprits will be indicted, the initial charges laid out, and a lot of the dem machine will be facing a legal firing squad. With dem funding from backdoor government sources choked off and many dem donors not wanting to throw their money into a dumpster fire, the feeble dems and feckless media are not going to be able to get much of a game going. That will hopefully secure the election when all the Nervous Nellie's realize the world isn't ending and we are not in a forever war.
11 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
JackBurton 4/19/2026 10:01:00 AM (No. 2094531)
In the 70s, we had two oil embargoes, no doubt instigated by the Soviets, that crippled (well, were of GREAT consternation) the West. The Mid East Arabs/Islamists had the oil and they called the tune. Meanwhile, we weren't fully exploiting oil in the Gulf, we're still not drilling off the East Coast (what's with that, Florida?) and ANWR stays untapped. I had been saying since the 70s that increasing OUR oil production was the way to dis-empower the sheiks. That and building nuclear.
Well, we're drilling now. Aside from the theologically rigid Shias (the Deep State of Iran), notice how everyone else is following the 'strong horse.'
I would say 'I told you so' but the Left is celebrating the new chocolate ration as an increase thanks to Big Brother.
4 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
JackBurton 4/19/2026 10:03:03 AM (No. 2094532)
Oh, and BTW, if you want the straight dope on energy, CO2 numbers, and enough stuff to put a college student on Red Bull to sleep, it's at the energy information agency courtesy of your tax dollars.
eia.gov
check it out.
5 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
john56 4/19/2026 12:08:52 PM (No. 2094603)
We keep hearing about the great .
military might of our foes.
With the possible exception of Russia, most of these foes' military might consists of keeping their own people in line. It's not real hard to fight people who are unarmed and hungry.
The Russians do have some battle testing, but the story told by Afghan rebels may be appropriate. When they fought the Russians, if you could kill the commander, the rest of the unut wouldn't know what to do. But if you killed the American commander,there was always someone to continue the fight, down to the last private.
1 person likes this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
LadyVet 4/19/2026 12:20:45 PM (No. 2094617)
Great link. #7. Good info.
2 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DVC 4/19/2026 1:56:03 PM (No. 2094670)
Turning off italics
3 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
DVC 4/19/2026 2:07:41 PM (No. 2094676)
The world's oceanic trade routes have about 6 or 8 'choke points'. Some include the Danish straits, which control Russian access in and out of the Baltic, and the Cape of Good Hope, for some weird reason, since there is no geographic choke at all....thousands of miles of open ocean.
Here is a map, these are worth knowing about....
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/maritime-choke-points.png
It is interesting that Trump has signed an agreement with Morocco, who controls the south side of the strait of Gibralter, which controls access to the Med and somewhat, the Black Sea. My father, who was a USN aircraft carrier captain had told me that driving a ship through the Strait of Malacca at night was a challenge, with massive number of ships flowing in two directions. I was in my early 20s and had never heard of this strait. It is a key choke point between the middle eastern oil and China and Japan. One or two US warships could shut it down, another of hte dozens of reasons China isn't going to ever take Taiwan by military force.
Controlling the oceanic trade choke points is a huge, huge 4D chess power move. And the Euroweenies are losing their checkers game.
And the Enemedia continues to call Trump a simpleton, out of touch, etc, etc, as he wipe the board clean in our favor.
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Mercedes44"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)