Are EVs The Biggest Boondoggle In Human History?
Issues & Insights,
by
The Editorial Board
Original Article
Posted By: RockyTCB,
2/10/2026 8:26:56 AM
When Stellantis last week announced it was writing down $26 billion, the CEO of the car company that now owns Chrysler, Antonio Filosa, said it was “part of a decisive process we started in 2025 to once again make our customers and their preferences our guiding star.”
Which begs the question: What was Stellantis’ guiding star before if not its own customers?
For that matter, who or what has been guiding General Motors (which announced a $7.6 billion writedown last month), Ford ($19.5 billion), and other automakers that’ve written down a total of $140 billion in just the past three years?
Anyone
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
bgarrett 2/10/2026 8:48:53 AM (No. 2066975)
I have never bought a new car and never will so I dont care about Stellantis but the fake coronavirus affected me and 330 million other Americans.That was more important than a car company going out of business
12 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 2/10/2026 9:03:16 AM (No. 2066984)
No, just a subset of "climate change," the biggest grifting boondoggle in history.
28 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
NorthernDog 2/10/2026 9:39:21 AM (No. 2067007)
I remember reading an article saying ''You Will Own an EV, Whether You Like it or Not''. I knew then it was doomed because Americans won't be forced to buy vehicles they do not want,
17 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Californian 2/10/2026 9:39:59 AM (No. 2067009)
These companies lost all that money due to fomo and failure to do market research.
I've had a model 3 for 8+ years. It's great. For me. But it is not great for most people.
These companies followed the crowd, went total sheep, and got creamed.
Toyota was the only large company who stood firm and said "no, EV aren't ready yet". Brutally criticized for holding firm. And now proven right as they did NOT lose billions investing in a technology thats not good for most drivers.
If the solid state batteries ever come out then EV will be ready for everyone. 700+ mile range, charge in 5-10 minutes, can not catch fire, last essentially forever, don't weigh more than lithium, high discharge rate for performance. Got it all. But not ready yet.
There are a few test cars on the road right now so maybe we'll see them by 2030 or so. They exist but aren't large scale production ready yet.
14 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Strike3 2/10/2026 9:47:55 AM (No. 2067012)
I'll take a shot. Pressure from the Biden administration dorks and some states forced those decisions. Incompetent leadership in those large corporations taking the step of directing so much money and facilities to what amounted to a pipe dream without infrastructure, subsidies to bribe buyers, and too much dependence on immature technology all combined to cause the EV collapse. The USPS and states that bought fleets of underperforming vehicles can now admire them lined up in their parking lots. Smart people rode out the Climate Change-caused storm by driving our old gasoline powered cars until the madness eventually burned out. Guess what, my 2008 Toyota Highlander did such a good job that I might just drive it for a few more years.
11 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
JimBob 2/10/2026 9:48:21 AM (No. 2067013)
I'm with #2.
"Global Cooling" (oops!) "Global Warming" (oops!) "Climate Change" (oops!) "Anthropogenic Climate Disruption" (I THINK that's what they're calling it now).... is the biggest SCAM in human history. Forcing EV's on everyone is a small to moderate part of that, if one takes ALL the "Climate" / "Net Zero" costs into the equation.
I don't blame the car makers. The 'Rats were well on their way to banning gasoline-powered cars and trucks, and the car makers wanted to stay in business. I think Kommieformia still has a law on the books banning the sale of gasoline or Diesel powered cars and trucks, starting at some point -I think around 2035. A few other 'Rat-controlled states may also have similar laws on the books.
Again, we should all thank President Trump!
DON'T FORGET! .... If 'Word-Salad'/'MattressBack' Harris and Tampon Timmy had succeeded in stealing the election, we would STILL BE IN THIER 'NET-ZERO' NIGHTMARE!
14 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 2/10/2026 10:23:13 AM (No. 2067022)
What the car manufacturers capitulated to was government pressure that was increasingly punishing gas vehicles and incentivizing EVs. The government does what it always does, apply high costs to not following government mandates and rewarding those who do. At some point businesses start to comply because they lose money if they don't and business is all about making a profit. Talk to the WaaPoo about that. No money means they can no longer push the Leftism which is driving away their customers. Ouch.
Trump does the same thing except he punishes influences from outside the country with tariffs and lets US businesses follow the market. In the case of EVs, he removed the government punishments on gas cars and the incentives to buy less desirable EVs. He is letting the customers decide what they want. They "vote" through their purchases. And he is letting the automakers follow their customers, which is what business should be doing.
Like any technology, EVs have a market. If they gain in functionality at reasonable costs, they MAY be worth considering for broader uses. But that has to happen through innovation, not government dictats.
The good thing about all this is that the "climate change" fraud, the driving force for all this dopey, bad stuff, has reached the end of its run. There has been too much failure of the dogma that drives it for too long. People are asking hard questions and the climate mongers are out of deflections that anyone will credit. Alternate, realistic science is entering the public domain. Trump is pulling government out of the mess and it is unlikely the Left will be able to rebuild their narrative in the future.
It's messy right now but it's over.
7 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
rikkitikki 2/10/2026 10:26:14 AM (No. 2067024)
The EV boondoggle is but the tip of the AGW iceberg (anthropogenic global warming)...which was junk science from the start.
Anyone can "prove" anything they choose with a computer model that is not constrained to accurately history match against known data.
Promoters of AGW, like Al Gore, Bill Nye, Joe Biden, and the entire democrat party, should all go to jail for pushing it.
10 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
DougTN 2/10/2026 10:52:26 AM (No. 2067039)
Billions and billions of dollars wasted on enriching the world’s most unproductive people. Never trust orchestrated grifters selling “science” that requires immediate economic control and chaos.
6 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
bamboozle 2/10/2026 10:59:06 AM (No. 2067046)
Wow: building a product that the customer wants? What a marketing strategy, pure genius
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
crashnburn 2/10/2026 11:20:51 AM (No. 2067064)
A few things. Global Warming aka Climate Change was cooked up by the Soviet Union to hamstring Western economies. DemoRoids and other leftists jumped on the bandwagon as it was a way to control their populations while lining their pockets. e.g. AlBore.
I've had several hybrid Toyotas - 2 Highlanders, a Rav 4, and a Lexus. The hybrid system adds up to 100 pounds to the cars weight. A smaller ICE is needed as the hybrid motor adds to the available power, which helps offset the weight of the hybrid system. All of them used regenerative charging so no need for a home charging station.
Tires and brakes might wear a little faster because of the additional weight, but nothing like they do in full EVs because of the enormous weight of the batteries. In fact, the extra wear of the tires and brakes adds to the pollution.
The electricity to charge EV batteries is not free, nor pollution free. Considering all the losses from the generators through the electrical grid, they produce about the same amount of pollution as an ICE, not counting the extra 80K miles worth of ICE pollution per vehicle that is generated when they refine the lithium into batteries.
Finally, the batteries are not recyclable, so there's that.
AFAIC, EVs were never more than expensive toys for SJWs who wanted to show how virtuous they are.
6 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
DVC 2/10/2026 12:41:44 PM (No. 2067103)
If not the biggest, certainly way up on the list.
I'd say that "climate change" scam is the biggest, by far, with these damned EVs as a subset of the huge "climate scam".
5 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw 2/10/2026 1:01:25 PM (No. 2067115)
I can think of bigger boondoggles, like The War on Poverty or War to end all wars but its right up there with the best.
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
mc squared 2/10/2026 4:26:01 PM (No. 2067186)
My 2001 F150 runs just fine with fluid changes and normal maintenance. What say you Greenies?
4 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Mcscow sailor 2/10/2026 8:30:02 PM (No. 2067229)
Commenter 11. À lot of people believe what you said about the co2 cost of battery production, but engineering analyses such as Erik Emilsson and Lisbeth Dahllöf. "Lithium-ion vehicle battery production: Status 2019 on energy use, CO2 emissions, use of metals, products environmental footprint, and recycling." IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute, in cooperation with the Swedish Energy Agency, Report C444, November 2019 suggest otherwise. A lot of people believe that EV’s are heavy, but my MY2.is lightle than the RDX it replaced, and has more carrying capacity, is more comfortably, and is quite. My use case needs are satisfied.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "RockyTCB"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)