Ford’s Felonious Failure
Issues & Insights,
by
The Editorial Board
Original Article
Posted By: RockyTCB,
12/17/2025 9:25:31 AM
At some point, there will be no news about the Ford Motor Company’s electric vehicle fiasco. But we’re not there yet, as the most recent reports show that the automaker is paying dearly for its commitment to a Potemkin market built by a government that promised favors to companies that would follow its agenda.
Ford’s EV misfortunes have reached a nearly unimaginable low. The company announced Monday that it’s taking a $19.5 billion writedown while eliminating a number of its EV models. Reuters calls it “the most dramatic example yet of the auto industry’s retreat from battery-powered models,”
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
swarfer 12/17/2025 9:53:12 AM (No. 2042452)
Saw this coming from day one. Did they actually talk to their customers? Ford is not a trend leader in anything, it doesn’t need to be. It just needs to make good cars people want, lots of them. It’s amazing how bad car company leadership has become. Not only are they having trouble building reliable cars, but can’t even figure out what their customers want. The attitude that they will tell you what to buy, like it or not, reminds me of the old Soviet Union central planning. Guess I shouldn’t be surprised, they were all under the thumb of liberal administrations doing their bidding forcing unaffordable green agenda programs on unsuspecting tax payers.
21 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
mc squared 12/17/2025 10:15:34 AM (No. 2042466)
But still can't let go:
FTA: " and expects that by 2030, half of all vehicles Ford sells globally will be hybrids, extended-range EVs and electric vehicles compared with 17% today. The lineup will include a smaller EV pickup."
6 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
DVC 12/17/2025 10:18:41 AM (No. 2042468)
Any sensible person knew that EVs were NOT going to be popular because they are not very useful and are extremely expensive, and very inconvenient.
The auto companies are being murdered by the EPA regs, requiring impossibly expensive and unreliable vehicles for horribly high prices.
A neighbor who has been buying and driving Ford pickups for the last 30 years gave his older pickup to a grandson and purchased a new Ram truck. He went to the Ford dealer and all they had was crap....EcoBoost motors which are tiny engines with a pair of very expensive turbochargers huffing and puffing to make the tiny engine produce a reasonable amount of power....for a short engine lifetime.
He knew that the EcoBoost engines were known to fail prematurely and didn't want one. He couldn't get anything else so he went over to Ram....also known as a troubled company, quality control wise, but Ram is giving a 10 year, 100,000 mile warranty, so that lessened his worry about their quality.
Ford used to produce some of THE MOST durable and reasonably priced trucks and cars. Their old 300 cubic inch six cylinder was legendary in durability. A friend drove one of those to 500,000 miles on the engine before the rust in the body got too bad to keep going.
No danger of a modern Ford going that long. And the EVs aren't selling at all. Unreliable tiny turbo motors furiously destroying themselves and EVs with short range which collapses to ridiculously short range if you add a trailer.
Shareholders need to get some sensible people running things before the company disappears down a rat hole of EPA regs and horrifically bad designs.
19 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
felixcat 12/17/2025 10:20:52 AM (No. 2042470)
So apparently, poor job performance by the Ford CEO is still rewarded in the private sector - and not just in the government.
I'm holding on to my 2015 Acura TLX - V6 engine. Hate the turbochargers.
7 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 12/17/2025 10:30:14 AM (No. 2042480)
EV’s were only part of the problem. CAFE standards have downsized engines to the point that you can’t get decent power without a turbocharger - or two. Anything that spins at 70,000 rpm is going to give you trouble sooner or later.
I like Toyota trucks. I’m on my second one. I thought about buying a new one, but you can’t get a V-6 anymore. They’re all 4-bangers with turbos. No, thanks. I’ll just have to perform scrupulous maintenance on my 2017 model so that it lasts until I die.
15 people like this.
Ford would do well to concentrate on the basics first- look at the lower body of any Ford truck over 3 years old and observe the rusted out body
8 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DougTN 12/17/2025 11:09:42 AM (No. 2042509)
Ford has a long and storied history of making poor business decisions.
2 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 12/17/2025 11:22:49 AM (No. 2042513)
But - - gee - - gee - - I hope they keep making electric golf carts. Retirement communities throughout Florida depend on them.
Save the electric golf cart!
3 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Mr Clean 12/17/2025 11:44:36 AM (No. 2042525)
Ford, et al. expected customers to be herded into EVs by increasingly onerous government mandates. But now they've potentially learned what the rest of us knew from the outset: Partnering with government, even indirectly, is rarely a wise choice.
12 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
franco 12/17/2025 12:26:32 PM (No. 2042533)
Felonious? No. Foolhardy? Yes. The I&I editors must have owned Ford stock and felt like they'd been robbed by Ford's stupidity. I doubt most Ford customers felt that way. As a long-time Ford customer, my bigger concern is that they have discontinued making mid-sized sedans, and that may force me to buy a VW or Toyota for my next car.
Far as EVs go, having been on this big blue marble for a few decades, I can confidently say now that EVs today will go the way of Sony's Betamax. Internal combustion engines are VHS format of motor vehicles -- proven, reliable technology. It took DVDs two decades to supplant VHS, and it will take at least that long to identify an energy plant for motor vehicles to replace gasoline. But it won't be battery-based.
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
chumley 12/17/2025 1:50:52 PM (No. 2042563)
They buckled to political pressure and it cost them billions. They make cars and have for over a hundred years. They had to know from the start this was a loser, yet they did it anyway. Did they learn the lesson?
7 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Timber Queen 12/17/2025 2:36:55 PM (No. 2042579)
I only bought one Ford: a '75 Mustang. It lived up to the acronym: Fix Or Repair Daily. The timing gear broke at 30,000 miles. My mechanic showed me the part. It was plastic "teeth" on a metal disc. Many of the plastic "teeth" were sheared off. That cost me $1,000. It was totaled after an encounter with a school bus on I-5 in Portland, OR in '82. I have never even looked at Ford cars since.
I'm in love with my current '96 Jeep Cherokee. She's my second '96 Cherokee. The first I bought in 2000, a stripped-down model owned by government agency. I drove it for 23 years, until it had untimely mating with a tree. TK went on the internet and found me another '96, this one the "Sport" model with all the bells and whistles, including a roof rack and rear window defroster with wiper blade! We recently took it to a fabulous repair place, and they did a complete diagnostic test. Fixed many things, refurbished parts and it's like brand new...for just $900. We had them do the same with TK's '96 Dodge Ram. It was a few thousand more, but worth it to keep it on the road...and infinitely less expensive than a new truck without the 8-foot bed!
8 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
ronniethek 12/17/2025 2:51:50 PM (No. 2042584)
Eff then.
1 person likes this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Redwing57 12/17/2025 5:06:25 PM (No. 2042622)
We have a 2018 Ford Edge, with 135,000 miles. I'd buy another one, but Ford killed it. They needed the plant floorspace to build.... EVs! One of their best selling vehicles for years, and they killed it for a vanity project.
Colossal stupidity. Ford top management has always been arrogant and self-centered. I worked there, and at Visteon after it was spun off, for 20 years. I've seen this. The management is built on a cut-throat yes man foundation, and was often a very difficult place in which to work. I was in engineering leadership roles for most of my career there.
2 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Geoman 12/17/2025 5:10:51 PM (No. 2042624)
The Biden administration didn't just use political pressure on Ford. They used regulatory pressure which can determine which manufacturers thrive, survive, or go under.
2 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
texaspast 12/17/2025 5:21:24 PM (No. 2042628)
Who wants an EV F-150? They couldn't sell them - not to anyone who actually wanted to use it for travel or work. But don't lump the EV's and the hybrids together. I bought a 2025 Powerboost F-150 (my fourth F-series truck) = never went looking for a hybrid, but when I had to trade in my F-250 because my wife found it just too rough to ride in (it wasn't!), I looked at the Powerboost. What sold me is that it has a 7.2kw generator built in that could power all the important stuff in my house for 35 hours on one tank of gas. And when it runs low on gas, I go get some more. Plus - it gets twice the milage m F-250 got. With a 7.3 liter (455 ci) engine, it was pushing it to get 12 mpg.
0 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 12/17/2025 6:29:28 PM (No. 2042635)
This decision to soldier on into the EV wasteland seems to be an abandonment of fiscal accountability to their stockholders. They are going to be writing off losses for the foreseeable future.
0 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Venturer 12/17/2025 7:32:39 PM (No. 2042652)
A retreat from bankruptcy.
0 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
paral04 12/17/2025 9:21:03 PM (No. 2042672)
Ford is based in Michigan and it gets bloody cold there. Haven't they considered what happens to battery powered vehicles under these conditions or are they too worried about whether their vehicles are made by transgenders to have a practical thought. Nobody wants a car or truck that won't start in cold weather or takes 45 minutes to charge on the highway..
0 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
lakerman1 12/18/2025 4:40:27 AM (No. 2042710)
Pickup truck ownership is guided, in part, by irrational thinking.
Here in cold and hilly western pennsylvania, there is a saying.I 'd rather push a Ford than drive a Chevy. Families are divided over the subject. Friends are alienated.
And all along, both sides were wrong.
My dad's 1954 Dodge D100,1/2 ton pick up straight 6 engine, three speed tranny, was far superior to Ford and Chevy. And its new list price in 1954?
1331 dollars!
0 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
mifla 12/18/2025 6:06:05 AM (No. 2042718)
Market forces always trump politics.
Back in the day, Ford was the only car company smart enough to not take a government bailout.
I guess all those executives have long since retired.
0 people like this.
These CEOs at Ford and Cracker Barrel....must be fired by their board of directors!
If not, the stockholders should sell their stock, because the company cares nothing about the value of the company. Their main agenda is ideology, not profit.
1 person likes this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Strike3 12/18/2025 8:10:11 AM (No. 2042766)
A company that goes under by 19 billion dollars does not deserve to survive. Close your doors, Ford and let the Asians show you how to do it right. Apologize to your stockholders and to Henry before you turn the lights out.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "RockyTCB"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)