King Charles 'evicts Prince Andrew from
Buckingham Palace after Epstein scandal
and will no longer be allowed to have
an office in the building or use its address
for correspondence,' source claims
Daily Mail (UK),
by
Brittany Chain
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
12/23/2022 7:34:35 PM
King Charles has finally thrown Prince Andrew out of the royal fold and told him he's 'on his own', a source has claimed.
Andrew was told to no longer use Buckingham Palace as an office space, effectively severing his final tie to his old life as a working royal, according to a new report in The Sun.
'Any presence at the Palace is officially over,' the source said. 'The King has made it clear. He isn't a working royal. He's on his own.'
As part of the King's decision, Andrew, 62, will not be able to use the address for any future correspondence.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
bogeegolf 12/23/2022 7:58:03 PM (No. 1363596)
Pretty ballsy for a tampon wannabe.
33 people like this.
As if I care, but I remember reading in history books that certain people ended up spending the rest of their lives chained to a wall in the Tower of London. Nowadays they get their P.O. box taken away and the keys to the palace loo no longer work. Andrew is now dubbed ,"The Pedophile Formerly Known As Duke"
Swim in the public disgust pool and wallow in pig sty of depravity with your fellow swine...oh, and you might wanna learn to code.
31 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
coyote 12/23/2022 8:31:57 PM (No. 1363613)
How about the money? Is that cut off too? If so, then it will sting.
25 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Calvinesq 12/23/2022 8:44:42 PM (No. 1363618)
King Charles is a saint. Oh, wait...
15 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Strike3 12/23/2022 8:58:58 PM (No. 1363623)
I'm behind on the important news, do Harry and Meggy still have keys?
26 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Zeek Wolfe 12/23/2022 9:00:12 PM (No. 1363624)
Your Royal Highness...you wanna let your crotch do your thinking, you gotta pay the price. At least King Charles didn't decree to Andrew "off with his......."
17 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
judy 12/23/2022 9:06:24 PM (No. 1363628)
Charles the adulteress judging someone else????Unbelievable!
25 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Citoyen 12/23/2022 9:07:10 PM (No. 1363629)
As far as I remember Prince Andrew is the only man who partied with Epstein to suffer any consequences. Over here we have Bill Clinton, who cozied up to Epstein far more than Andrew, who is still the toast of the town for ruling class. The king of England is tougher than our rulers.
56 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
thefield 12/23/2022 9:22:13 PM (No. 1363638)
If we had our way, with Charles, Andrew would have been king.
3 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
zephyrgirl 12/23/2022 9:26:40 PM (No. 1363641)
The only "proof" that former teenaged trollop had was the picture of herself (fully-clothed) with Andrew (also fully-clothed). It was a "she said, he said" situation. So what if they were both in the same town at the same time? Andrew was stupid to pay her millions to go away. If he thought that would clear his name, he is even stupider than I think. Aspiring feminine hygiene product Charles who flaunted, then married his former mistress is in no position to judge his brother, but then Charles is king and Andrew isn't.
22 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Harlowe 12/23/2022 9:51:49 PM (No. 1363652)
Let it be clearly understood that this writer is NOT condoning infidelity. Since Charles became king, condemnations of him as well as Camilla have been unrelenting. While Scripture is clear about infidelity, Scripture is clear that if sinners sincerely repent, their sins can be forgiven. It is impossible for any mortal to know what is in the hearts of Charles and Camilla but God knows and that is what matters.
This couple fell in love decades ago but life events took them in different directions even though it appears they never lost their love for each other. News accounts revealed that Queen Elizabeth became fond of Camilla and other members of the royal family seem to get along well with her including William and Kate. Since Camilla’s marriage to Charles in 2005, she has worked diligently on behalf of the royal family and seems to be warmly received by many people of Great Britain. Judge not. (Matthew 7:1-5)
31 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
thewarden 12/23/2022 9:59:43 PM (No. 1363655)
BS. Andrew lives in a house given to him by his mother years ago on the grounds of Windsor Castle (in Great Windsor Park). He lives there with Fergie, his ex-wife. He hasn’t lived in Buck House since he was a teen. And by the way, Andrew made poor choices in friends (Epstein) but the photo of him and his “accuser”, Virginia Guiffre, has been proven to be photoshopped. He settled the lawsuit to appease The Queen in her Jubilee Year. Do I think he is a typical rich and privileged male jerk off, yes, but that woman was of legal age and compensated per her request. She was a hooker and Andrew a moron. Tale as old as time (and I am female). Let it go, King Two Buck Chuck (and let’s talk about your marital infidelity to Diana, and hers…lol). Jerk.
22 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Trump'sCousin 12/23/2022 10:19:22 PM (No. 1363665)
Chuckles III is...
DIRTEE
4 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
JimBob 12/23/2022 10:56:04 PM (No. 1363668)
It seems to me that the 'Class Act' died with Queen Elizabeth.
Hopefully it will be restored when Charlie is out of the picture and William is in charge.
9 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
PostAway 12/23/2022 11:57:01 PM (No. 1363690)
Many Americans have a distrust of hereditary titles and the superior power and privileges they confer. And yet a lot of Americans historically have some respect for those traditions in a few other countries including the UK. However, it seems only fair that to enjoy the exalted status of royalty a person must earn and maintain trust and respect through superior conduct over the course of decades. Neither Charles nor Andrew did and everyone knows it. Whether Andrew was involved with Epstein or not he was known as Randy Andy when a young man because of his reputation for ribald antics and sexual promiscuity. Pathological liar Ginger the Whack Job is another winner. I say the Windsor’s put no-nonsense Anne in charge to restore some credibility and common sense to the throne.
5 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
bighambone 12/23/2022 11:57:05 PM (No. 1363691)
When Chuck jerks Harry and Meghan’s Duke and Duchess titles he will show that he is really bigtime!
20 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 12/24/2022 12:43:29 AM (No. 1363701)
So it ends the saga of Randy Andy, as he was known before sagging jaws and empty pockets took hold. His title may get him a pint or a cuppa tea somewhere. Don't ask King Charles.
4 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Pepperpot59 12/24/2022 2:22:46 AM (No. 1363721)
I find it terrifying that the only person who has been punished for his crimes is prince Andrew. What about all the American Elite that were involved with the Epstein Island Fiasco? Oh the FBI conveniently lost the videotapes. I would like to see Justice done on those who hurt children. It isn't right that there's one law for people who have lots of money and are liberal and another law for those who are poor and conservative.
12 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
mifla 12/24/2022 4:47:20 AM (No. 1363743)
I hope Harry and Meghan are taking notes.
4 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Daisymay 12/24/2022 8:46:29 AM (No. 1363856)
What Andrew did was Unforgivable. However, I suspect Charles, of all People, shouldn't be the one to Throw Stones! Charles ALSO did the unforgivable by having a Mistress the whole time he was married to Diana. He made her life miserable as he made it plain to her that he has someone else he loved! So now he wants to be Judge and Jury! I find that CHARLES certainly has a short memory, and wants everyone to forget what HE did to Diana. I don't think so, Charlie! You will always be a Bloody Skank in my Book. I don't care how many times they call him King. He's still a Low Life Spoiled Royal who doesn't DESERVE to be King which is exactly why his Mother never handed him the Crown while she was alive!!
9 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
TXknitter 12/24/2022 8:52:59 AM (No. 1363863)
There are some quietly-held opinions about this amongst some older Brits especially. My SIL in Haworth said there are sentiments King Charles finally handling embarrassing Andrew appropriately. He has wrongly protected for decades. His daughters won’t be happy but oh well.
3 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
franq 12/24/2022 8:56:06 AM (No. 1363866)
Ah, the travails of royalty. So interesting and edifying.
1 person likes this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Miamiwarrior 12/24/2022 9:06:07 AM (No. 1363879)
Finally. But who are the others in Epsteins flight list ?
7 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
MickTurn 12/24/2022 10:03:02 AM (No. 1363934)
Change his title to Pervert Andrew!
0 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 12/24/2022 11:02:26 AM (No. 1364018)
Charlie might want to change the locks on the palace. There are two more stray cats in California who if for nothing else you owe it to Q-E to ditch them for calling her a racist along with everyone else. Do your job plow boy.
4 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
smokincol 12/24/2022 11:05:40 AM (No. 1364022)
WOW!! ... and I thought my brothers were bad!!
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)