Is this the Supreme Court case that will
drain the swamp?
American Thinker,
by
Paul Dowling
Original Article
Posted By: DW626,
11/30/2022 5:09:28 AM
"The Question: How can you support, and defend, the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can't. Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election?
Reply 1 - Posted by:
chance_232 11/30/2022 5:41:30 AM (No. 1345451)
I expect the SC to permanently squash investigations and lawsuits regarding the 2020 election. The Supreme Court can't tell Congress what to do. Only what they can and can't do after the fact.
14 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 11/30/2022 5:51:58 AM (No. 1345455)
Welcome to the United States of China. Folks don’t spend 10 million to win a lifetime job that pays under 200 grand for nothin....they will never turn around and investigate how they got there.
28 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
bpl40 11/30/2022 6:05:16 AM (No. 1345461)
There is no legislative or judicial relief on this issue. Anymore than there was against George III. Revolution is the only answer as it was in 1776! Yes, the world is different now but Liberty is still Liberty.
28 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
ussjimmycarter 11/30/2022 6:06:57 AM (No. 1345463)
The Supreme Court is a collection of pikers! The “Reset Managers” moving the US to Communism are the new rule setters!
16 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Subsuburban 11/30/2022 6:11:21 AM (No. 1345465)
Short answer: No.
11 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
5 handicap 11/30/2022 6:18:03 AM (No. 1345471)
Roberts doesn't have the strength of Character to protect the Constitution and will violate his oath as well as these FILTHY Democrats have.
33 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Msquared112 11/30/2022 6:23:10 AM (No. 1345473)
SCOTUS wants to squash election challenges once and for all, believing them a threat to the Constitution. The case will not be the answer to election fraud. It will be the death knell to election challenges of fraud.
21 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
privateer 11/30/2022 6:46:57 AM (No. 1345494)
Lately, I am seeing a lot of columns that begin with an intriguing, but ultimately pointless question. They often are the equivalent of click-bait: lose 35 pounds a day with this one weird trick, that doctors don't want you to know about. The only thing more useless than writing them, is reading them. The posters are right. This will only be heard by the Supine Corpse so as to close the subject of the Great Election Theft of 2020 for ever. At least as a legal issue.
15 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Rinktum 11/30/2022 7:31:33 AM (No. 1345516)
Does anyone have any faith in the willingness of SCOTUS to wade into the waters of election fraud? Not a chance. They know democrats and their unhinged followers would destroy them.
Show me anyone in the country with the courage and clout it would take to even legitimize the evidence we have already seen by allowing it to receive a fair and honest investigation. No one will touch it and if they do, they immediately are labeled as election deniers and canceled. If the truth ever sees the light of day, the entire corrupt and lawless force behind the 2020 election fraud would be exposed as liars, cheats, and frauds. That will not happen. Those behind this theft have overthrown our Republic. It was not done with weapons of war but with corrupt, evil men entrenched in government, bureaucracy, the judiciary, law enforcement and military all enabled and supported by a willing media. They used every tool of a coup d’etat except violent force as an effective non-violent means to undermine the will of the people and overthrow the government. Now they are just tying up loose ends. They have to keep a lid on the truth for fear the American people will finally come to the realization that their government was stolen from them. They don’t want the natives getting restless which is why Republicans had some success in 2022. Don’t expect much in the future. We have become conditioned to accept election fraud and know we dare not question it.
28 people like this.
W/o reading the column the answer is “no”.
10 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 11/30/2022 7:51:15 AM (No. 1345531)
Zero chance that the SCOTUS will intervene in the Great Election Fraud of 2020. Recall the closed-door meeting the justices were having in December 2020 whether to hear the Texas voting fraud case. CJ Roberts was overheard by nearby court clerks screaming at his associate justices to back off from this case or risk investigation, impeachment, and conviction. And recall what Justice Thomas said back to him which I can't repeat here.
17 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 11/30/2022 7:59:20 AM (No. 1345541)
I practiced law a long time and the grounds for relief sound a bit thin to me. High sounding claims that I suspect will amount to nothing.
7 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Krause 11/30/2022 8:05:47 AM (No. 1345546)
This case is too big for the Supreme Court.
11 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
David Key 11/30/2022 9:24:32 AM (No. 1345619)
Wishful thinking. The most the Supreme Court could do is to roll back the filth a little. Remember, SCOTUS is as much a part of the problem as the rest of the corrupt administration and congress.
6 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
MDConservative 11/30/2022 9:59:31 AM (No. 1345657)
More babble. The Congress is NOT the governing body for any elections. That responsibility belongs to the states. Congress accepts state certifications as to the winners. As always these days, "real conservatives" look to the Federal courts for relief, looking to expand the law further while whining about liberal judges, etc. Go fight this in the states that one chooses, like Arizona. Oh, and first investigate, find real cases that involve more than onsies and twosies. Prove those machines were rigged. Anything else is just accusations and suppositions. Oh, look...is that a Kraken?
3 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
stablemoney 11/30/2022 10:00:42 AM (No. 1345659)
They should also sue the SC, who chose to not hear any election fraud cases, without any court hearing to determine if there was any election fraud, choosing not to use the adversarial method to hear all sides of the issue, and examine any evidence. That is a disgusting and cowardly dereliction of duty.
6 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
vhs68 11/30/2022 10:13:23 AM (No. 1345670)
The current 2022 election in Arizona also needs to be investigated NOW, while all evidence is still fresh and clear as to what happened.
9 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
velirotta 11/30/2022 11:33:05 AM (No. 1345744)
All the above comments may indeed reflect reality, but a nation of patriots who humbled themselves in mighty prayer to God might make a miracle happen.
5 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
janjan 11/30/2022 11:42:25 AM (No. 1345755)
There will never be a Supreme Court case that will drain the swamp.
2 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
nh23847 11/30/2022 12:13:35 PM (No. 1345788)
The above posters seem to forget that the Supreme Court even took the case. Everyone was surprised. They could have just passed. And the case is not about election fraud, but rather, did congress violate the constitution. Their decision will be interesting to hear out and maybe a precedent going forward (one way or the other).
7 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Zeek Wolfe 11/30/2022 12:31:55 PM (No. 1345802)
The simple fact of the matter is this. SCOTUS not withstanding, winning the Democrat nomination will be tantamount to winning the general election for the presidency from now on. Democrat thievery and deceit are now a routine part of the system. The Mexican Institutional Revolutionary Party "won" every election for el presidente over a period of 70 years. That is the direction we are headed. If we are lucky! Huh? Another scenario is a takeover rule by a politburo and commissars staffed by Democrat running dogs of George Soros, Nancy Pelosi, Charles Shumer, and/or their descendants enforced by an SS/KGB-like Antifa-BLM organization.
2 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Pammie 11/30/2022 12:33:37 PM (No. 1345803)
Please STOP being eternal pessimists! We, the American people, should be optimistic that the SCOTUS even took the case in the first place. GEEZE!
3 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
billsv 11/30/2022 12:41:25 PM (No. 1345810)
I do not see this case on any agenda of SCOTUS. Is it in the lower courts somewhere?
0 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
lakerman1 11/30/2022 2:30:44 PM (No. 1345863)
In 2008, several cases concerning the constitutionality of Barack Obolaa to serve as president made their way to the U.S. Supreme Court, and in each case, the Court ruled that the persons who filed the case had no legal standing - that only the Congress could decide eligibility.
I wonder if Chief Judas John Rierts will go in that direction again.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "DW626"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)