TIME Magazine Prepares For Trump 2.0 With
‘If He Wins’ Cover Story, Outlines
EPIC Second Term Agenda
Gateway Pundit,
by
Ben Kew
Original Article
Posted By: Harlowe,
4/30/2024 1:05:22 PM
TIME magazine has released a major cover story preparing its readers for Trump’s return to the White House. In a long-form interview with the former president, journalist Eric Cortellessa establishes Trump’s key failing in his first term in office; he didn’t go far enough. [Snip] What emerged in two interviews with Trump, and conversations with more than a dozen of his closest advisers and confidants, were the outlines of an imperial presidency that would reshape America and its role in the world.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Harlowe 4/30/2024 1:07:04 PM (No. 1709050)
For direct access to the full transcript:
https://time.com/6972022/donald-trump-transcript-2024-election/
"Read the Full Transcripts of Donald Trump’s Interviews With TIME" --- TIME Staff – April 30, 2024
For access to the second story:
https://time.com/6972021/donald-trump-2024-election-interview/
“How Far Trump Would Go” --- Eric Cortellessa – April 30, 2024
0 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 4/30/2024 1:16:05 PM (No. 1709055)
Nobody reads Time Magazine anymore. Let them say what they want.
8 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Rama41 4/30/2024 1:21:46 PM (No. 1709058)
Written to scare the wits out of Democrats.
7 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
franq 4/30/2024 1:43:07 PM (No. 1709070)
Oh, you mean like, "... fundamentally transform..."?
7 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
FormerDem 4/30/2024 1:53:56 PM (No. 1709080)
I cannot remember any issue ever where the news media were so directive to readers as to what they should believe, cf. "his false assertion that the 2020 election was stolen." Note to Time, this is not going to age well. Everybody else seems to know more than you do, showing there was some theft, and as to how much, nobody knows including you. The Democrats will not allow audits or cleaning of the electoral rolls. Draw your own conclusion from that. Will not age well, all these liddle editorials and finger shaking at us.
6 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Omen55 4/30/2024 1:55:45 PM (No. 1709084)
Nancy will go ballistic!
0 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DVC 4/30/2024 2:05:22 PM (No. 1709094)
I will be praying for President Trump.
5 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Harlowe 4/30/2024 2:27:40 PM (No. 1709109)
Having had the privilege and honor of enjoying this website for 20 years, it is disheartening to see a change in poster commentary that, in the past, offered a perspective instead of what now seems to be an all too ready reaction, an instant dismissiveness with a snarky remark simply because an article appears in a liberal publication. There is no question most articles in liberal publications present the liberal mind-set, however, some articles contain substance worthy of being read and these TIME interviews with President Trump are examples of “SUBSTANCE” despite the mistaken perception/presentation by liberal journalists. It is sincerely hoped that simply because a known liberal publication offers an article that may be worth reading is not at least given a quick review before denouncing it—it might be a diamond in the rough.
3 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
acesfull 4/30/2024 2:33:35 PM (No. 1709111)
I find it hard to continue reading any article/interview where the writer/interviewer states unequivocally that there was no election fraud. It has always been understood by both parties that all elections have “irregularities “. Now the dims want to say that 2020 election was the exception and was handled perfectly.
5 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Harlowe 4/30/2024 4:07:37 PM (No. 1709195)
#9~ Such reticense is understood, however, with these two interviews, disregard, totally detach from the journalist and read President Trump’s responses. Forget the journalist’s opining and read, absorb the content, the substance of President Trump’s responses that provide an insight into a second term of office that are more illuminating and explicit than what is usually or can be presented/provided in his massive rallies.
3 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Rama41 4/30/2024 4:56:30 PM (No. 1709239)
#10. Absolutely right. The interviews stand by themselves.
1 person likes this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
DVC 4/30/2024 6:08:17 PM (No. 1709284)
The interviewer is a bit obnoxious, but Trump gives great answers, about what you'd think.
The transcript is well worth your time, thank you, OP.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Harlowe"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)