10 Reasons Not to Buy an Electric Car
Hot Air,
by
Blaze Media
Original Article
Posted By: Hazymac,
4/26/2024 8:41:33 AM
1. We've been down this road before
Paul: Electric cars are not new. When the 1901 Chicago Auto Show was staged, more than half of the fourteen vehicles that were shown at that show were electric vehicles. It's not a new idea at all. The problem is, is that there's this nasty little thing called practicality.
Advertisement
There are a lot of people who are saying, "I've seen all of this, I apparently should be doing it." And then they get hit with the harsh realities of what happens with an electric vehicle.
2. They're more expensive than you think
Lauren: If you're thinking about buying an electric car ...
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
bamapreacher 4/26/2024 8:49:53 AM (No. 1706382)
Can anyone post a link to avoid the Blaze subscription demand?
30 people like this.
Reason #11 I just don't want one.
33 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
philsner 4/26/2024 8:52:53 AM (No. 1706388)
I already know all the reasons. Why should I subscribe when I have Captain Obvious?
19 people like this.
PAYWALL.
12 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Jerseyden 4/26/2024 9:21:35 AM (No. 1706413)
Anything being pushed by the dems and backed by the msm can't be good for working Americans.
18 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
joew9 4/26/2024 9:41:16 AM (No. 1706428)
If you're not charging your electric car with a windmill or solar panels you are only pretending.
A typical state needs 45 thousand MegaWatts of generating capacity.
For just 1 thousand MegaWatts of generating capacity it will take 70 to 100 square miles of solar panels.
That's square miles NOT acres.
So for the entire needs of a state to be met about 10% of the state will have to be shaved bare of any plant growth, covered in gravel and concrete, then covered in solar panels. How environmentally green is it to destroy that much green plants and trees?
BUT if we replace the present fossil fuels usage with electricity then generating capacity will have to triple. So change that to 30% of the land shaved bare.
16 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Rand Al'Thor 4/26/2024 9:43:56 AM (No. 1706433)
Paywall - but here are 20 reasons:
https://www.evseekers.com/20-reasons-not-to-buy-an-electric-car/
15 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 4/26/2024 10:09:28 AM (No. 1706454)
Some thoughts:
- Billions have been invested in EV technology. If the technology fails, alot of people are going to lose their shirts. That alone is incentive to make the technology work.
- The runway to make EVs work in the US is quickly approaching and end. Any car that is manufactured in the US quickly ceases production if it does not catch on. EVs have been given a huge grace period to work out all the problems. Not sure its happening.
- Watch the rest of the world to see if EVs catch on anywhere. In particular, Europe. Read that the range of EVs in Europe have doubled and is set to double again. Is it true? Who knows? I don't trust any reporting. Europe is also coming out with EV tractor/trailers to replace diesel powered tractor/trailers. Can see this technology never catching on in the US, but being embraced elsewhere.
8 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
kennedylaw 4/26/2024 10:15:38 AM (No. 1706462)
I considered buying an EV. They can be practical IF (1) you own your own home and can install a high speed charger in your garage, (2) you have low cost electricity in your area or solar panels and battery storage, (3) you live in an urban area, (4) you only use it to drive around town, always within range of your home charger, (5) you have an internal combustion car for whenever you want to drive more than 100 miles from your house, (6) you lease instead of buying so you do not get stuck with it when the battery wears out. Also, the EV has to qualify for government subsidies or it simply is not affordable. After considering all of the pros and cons I decided to buy a used SUV instead.
13 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
franq 4/26/2024 10:42:18 AM (No. 1706497)
End the EV "tax credit" then see how they do. I'll be blunt... On another thread a familiar EV supporter stated $48k was not an unreasonable amount for a vehicle these days. I could buy about 6 vehicles, and expect them to each run 10 years or more, for that kind of money. How do I know? It's what I've done all my life. I've owned ONE new car. A 1981 Citation that I kept about 12 years until it succumbed to rust. In NC, where I live now, that's not an issue. You can have your bells and whistles, it's a free country so far.
7 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
mc squared 4/26/2024 10:48:09 AM (No. 1706502)
I can read it in Firefox by hitting F9 at the top of the keyboard.
8 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
hisself 4/26/2024 10:54:21 AM (No. 1706507)
To #6: How much CO2 absorption is lost by removing vegetation to install solar to save on CO2?
9 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
privateer 4/26/2024 11:06:38 AM (No. 1706514)
I don't think there could be trademark infringement anymore, so why not call them 'Hopemobiles'? If you think they are practical, worth the cost, and will eventually dominate the car market, you are obviously full of 'Hope'...and that's not all.
6 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 4/26/2024 11:08:36 AM (No. 1706520)
For paywall use Webpage Archive.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
DVC 4/26/2024 11:22:40 AM (No. 1706539)
We went to a local restaurant that my wife wanted to try a couple of evenings ago. It is attached to a large shopping mall, and there is a row of electric car chargers there for the mall. Most of the chargers were empty, of course, but there were three cars there with the people standing around or sitting in the cars, the endless EV wait for the eyedropper to fill up their "fuel tank".
And when we had ordered our food, gotten it, eaten it, visited the restroom and cleaned up and headed out, perhaps an hour or a bit more later....the EV folks were still there "fuel" drip, drip, dripping into their "fuel tank". I think one had left.
In any case, I had a good laugh at their expense. What a giant time waster those damned foolish things are.
17 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
jalo1951 4/26/2024 11:48:19 AM (No. 1706562)
Reason #: THEY SUCK! No other reasons needed.
10 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
DVC 4/26/2024 11:54:35 AM (No. 1706567)
EVs have been available to buy for 130+ years. I spent a day visiting a EV factory in Sebring, Florida in 1974, at the Sebring Vanguard factory. They have ALL failed in the marketplace.
EVs have been "the car of the future" for 130+ years, and that remains true today. Chemical batteries, while much improved now, are NEVER going to be able to have the energy density of a tank of gasoline, or the speed of "refilling" of that same tank of liquid petroleum fuel.
NEVER.
Stop wasting our time. And more CO2 isa BENEFIT to green plants and all living things. CO2 is not harmful, not a pollutant. This oft repeated tale is still a lie, no matter how often they repeat it.
14 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
MickTurn 4/26/2024 1:06:38 PM (No. 1706628)
Who needs 10, the simple FACT that the cars catch fire all by themselves is all we need to know!
7 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
BarryNo 4/26/2024 5:03:10 PM (No. 1706765)
Only ten reasons?
4 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Hazymac"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)