Federal Court Strikes Down Felony Voting
Ban As ‘Cruel And Unusual Punishment’
In Unprecedented Ruling
Daily Wire,
by
Corrine Murdock
Original Article
Posted By: Beardo,
9/10/2023 3:50:22 PM
A federal appeals court ruled against Mississippi’s permanent voting ban for certain felons, going against Supreme Court precedent in doing so. (snip) Judge Edith Jones countered in a dissenting opinion that the majority ruling itself contradicted the Constitution and reflected judicial activism. (snip) Jones also cited the Supreme Court precedent set in the 1974 case Richardson v. Ramirez, which determined that felon voting bans don’t violate the Equal Protection Clause. In that case, the court ruled that the question of handling voting rights for felons should be hashed out in a legislative forum, and that it wasn’t for their court to “choose one set of values over another.”
Reply 1 - Posted by:
SALady 9/10/2023 4:02:39 PM (No. 1553430)
They know this will be overturned by the SCOTUS.
But it will take months -- probably until after November of 2024 -- so that lots of Mississippi felons (who are a safe Demon-Rat voter base) will be able to vote in the 2024 election.
Lie-beral judicial activism as it's most vile and evil!!!!!
42 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Omen55 9/10/2023 4:39:28 PM (No. 1553449)
MS will appeal on fast track to SCOTUS who will take up because of election year.
17 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
bkt23 9/10/2023 5:15:03 PM (No. 1553479)
I'm not opposed to this, but probably for different reasons.
Nowhere in the Constitution are classes of citizens defined: those who may vote and those who may not, for example. Quite to the contrary, voting being a right is clearly mentioned multiple times.
A felon is still a citizen.
Therefore, after he or she has done the time in prison, all their rights should be back in place, including their right to vote, own weapons, etc.
Now, if you say "but these animals brutally killed X amount of others and they shouldn't be allowed to vote or have firearms" then I would say the problem lies with the justice system. People who violently harmed other shouldn't be citizens anymore. They should have been executed. That's just my humble opinion.
38 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
49 Ford 9/10/2023 5:31:39 PM (No. 1553497)
OP's comment says it all.
9 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Beardo 9/10/2023 5:48:57 PM (No. 1553512)
#4 says "Nowhere in the Constitution are classes of citizens defined: those who may vote and those who may not"
FTA:
Section Two of the Fourteenth Amendment allows states to deprive citizens of the right to vote for either “participation in rebellion, or other crime.”
26 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Beardo 9/10/2023 5:52:36 PM (No. 1553516)
Sorry, I meant #3 says
8 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DVC 9/10/2023 6:52:21 PM (No. 1553556)
Nope. Not cruel, and NOT AT ALL unusual.
15 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
kono 9/10/2023 7:43:20 PM (No. 1553575)
The framers of the Constitution had a well-developed understanding of these matters that our generation would do well to contemplate, before we presumptuously dismiss their conclusions.
On the bright side, it opens the possibility that the J6 patriots could be able to vote, despite being thrown into the gulags by the swamp.
11 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
TunnelEffect 9/10/2023 8:26:48 PM (No. 1553595)
Mississippi has requested an en banc rehearing (full court instead of just three members). That may go faster than a SCOTUS rehearing. SPLC strikes again.
6 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
TunnelEffect 9/10/2023 8:27:53 PM (No. 1553596)
Just stopping the italics. Sorry.
4 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
BarryNo 9/11/2023 7:05:20 AM (No. 1553763)
May I point out that historically, the felons in question would all have been hung upon conviction, making the matter, moot.
Shall we go back to hanging?
10 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
The Remnants 9/11/2023 7:34:38 AM (No. 1553787)
What better way to define "cruel and unusual punishment" then to study the experience of the January 6 prisoners.
20 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Zigrid 9/11/2023 11:02:12 AM (No. 1553930)
Another attempt by the rats to undermine the constitution ...a felon has lost his/her/it right to be a citizen in good standing and able to vote...it's just another attempt at election interference....
6 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Penney 9/11/2023 2:19:36 PM (No. 1554052)
Where are these anti-Constitutionalst Government officials coming from? Seems every day now another one abuses their own Oath of Office and the U.S.A Cnstitution.
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Sgtglh 9/11/2023 3:27:31 PM (No. 1554087)
One additional "change of course" would be a change of voting. It is wrong for a drug addict, welfare queen, with 10 keeeds with 10 different fathers to have the same one vote as a "Congressional Medal of Honor" recipient.
0 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
swarfer 9/11/2023 4:19:05 PM (No. 1554118)
Another moronic, idiotic, ridiculous, anti-Constitutional ruling. Since half the people don’t bother to vote, it is impossible to consider banning felony voting cruel. And of course it’s not unusual since it has been accepted for years. Judicial activism is just dictatorship by the unelected. Perhaps it’s not judicial activism, just a judicial stupidity. Lowering the bar to the least common denominator.
1 person likes this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
skacmar 9/11/2023 7:10:52 PM (No. 1554165)
Of course the Democrat appointed judge ruled in favor of the convicted felons. Democrat appointed judges, the Biden administration, and it seems the entire DOJ and Federal Government are all about protecting and coddling criminals and giving them free reign over everyone else.
0 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Socio 9/11/2023 8:52:28 PM (No. 1554201)
Hard to believe that a political party that depends on the felon vote, the illegal immigrant vote, the seniors in nursing homes on psychotropic drugs vote, and the dead vote to win elections is running the country.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Beardo"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Clinton appointee.