UN postpones vote on global carbon tax
after Trump-led pushback
Fox News,
by
Morgan Phillips
Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought,
10/17/2025 5:02:19 PM
After a U.S.-led campaign, the United Nations has postponed a vote on a proposal to impose the world’s first global carbon tax on shipping, delaying the decision by one year.
The rule was expected to come up for a vote this week as part of the U.N. International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) "Net-Zero Framework." But a majority of member nations voted to defer it after failing to reach consensus amid U.S. opposition.
Backed by the European Union and Brazil, the plan seeks to raise billions from carriers that exceed new emissions limits, channeling the revenue toward climate adaptation and clean-fuel projects in developing nations.
Washington and Riyadh led the opposition.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Hazymac 10/17/2025 5:19:35 PM (No. 2018140)
Fine. Knock yourselves out, you greedy so and so's. The USA has the veto power and will use it.
23 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Catherine 10/17/2025 5:19:53 PM (No. 2018141)
Don't let them get their foot in the door on this stuff. There will be no end to it.
35 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Strike3 10/17/2025 5:25:38 PM (No. 2018144)
Something scared them. I wonder what it was?
17 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
DVC 10/17/2025 5:28:45 PM (No. 2018146)
Big middle finger to these punks and dictators. They can "charge" a global tax but we won't pay it and they cannot compel us or anyone else pay it.
23 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
DVC 10/17/2025 5:39:02 PM (No. 2018150)
Re #1, even if not vetoed, the UN has no global taxing power. Scroom.
30 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 10/17/2025 5:45:29 PM (No. 2018155)
First, this idea of zero-net emissions is pure ego and aspirational.
It's not achievable, today, or any time close.
The fuels needed aren't available, and they don't have enough "gas stations" around the globe, particularly in the United States (thank the environmental groups).
Besides, despite all the push from the EU folks, they don't want to pay the higher price for the significantly higher costs of these new fuels.
Ocean vessel emissions are 3% of the total global emissions.
It would be significant if they can reduce by 50% or maybe 70%. They are within reach.
Do not forget the Paris Accords had a timeline to meet their target (by 2100) and there are still almost 75 years left.
Get the emissions down and work on technology to help resolve the remaining portion say from 2050 to 2100.
Be reasonable, not punitive.
9 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
sw penn 10/17/2025 6:14:02 PM (No. 2018164)
"channeling the revenue toward climate adaptation and clean-fuel projects in developing nations. "
Yet another slush fund for trust fund babies...
17 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Ida Lou Pino 10/17/2025 6:31:05 PM (No. 2018169)
So - - this means we're all going to die!
The ony question is - - will it be from heat prostration or from huge tidal waves?
Me? I'll take the tidal waves.
5 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
itsonlyme 10/17/2025 6:46:49 PM (No. 2018171)
The international elitist Notsee Cabal needs a global tax placed on the plebeians everywhere. They are there for you to obey their wishes.
4 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
padiva 10/17/2025 6:48:35 PM (No. 2018172)
Move the UN to Gaza.
Great climate
Great land values
Close to the beach
Use a circus tent for the General Assembly
21 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Venturer 10/17/2025 6:54:01 PM (No. 2018173)
Raping the shipping industry so they pee away the money on green garbage.
11 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
mc squared 10/17/2025 7:25:17 PM (No. 2018185)
For one year. Then this exercise again. And again until we have a Democrat back in the WH.
10 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
JimBob 10/17/2025 9:09:45 PM (No. 2018221)
The ability to Tax..... that would be a HUGE step forward toward the One World Government that the UN wants to be.
I'm with President Trump..... tell 'em to go Stuff it!
10 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
czechlist 10/17/2025 9:25:33 PM (No. 2018226)
Someone convince me that the UN isn't a worthless.entity
UN out of US and US out of UN. Build a new HQ in Gaza
12 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
danu 10/17/2025 10:26:08 PM (No. 2018239)
postpones?? pls mr president, dump these chumps in the river and forever close that den of iniquity.
11 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
mobyclik 10/18/2025 6:13:07 AM (No. 2018277)
No matter how much money those creeps collected, about 60% of it would simply disappear.....somehow.
7 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
smak90 10/18/2025 7:13:58 AM (No. 2018297)
This has absolutely nothing to do with climate change or green agenda. This is only about implementing the first global tax framework to generate revenue for the global elites to have more control over the world. It's a major stepping stone to a One World Govt.
10 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
LLAMA 10/18/2025 7:15:57 AM (No. 2018299)
The US should secede from the UN, and remove their HQ from NYC. It is absurd to propose that any international tax has validity in our independent nation. (The founders must be rolling over in their graves.) And there are other UN Security Council members who will veto this - Russia, for one.
8 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
janjan 10/18/2025 9:10:32 AM (No. 2018353)
The next liberal/socialist that cheats their way into the White House will happily agree to it.
5 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
red1066 10/18/2025 9:38:44 AM (No. 2018370)
Sure. Like China, the world's biggest polluter would adhere to this.
4 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
stablemoney 10/18/2025 10:29:54 AM (No. 2018406)
The communist reprobates are never rid of, only pushed back.
5 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
PrayerWarrior 10/18/2025 10:44:19 AM (No. 2018415)
The U.N. is a bunch of money grubby idiots. Why are we still in the U.N.? They're worse
than useless. They're a bunch of murdering thugs.
4 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Hazymac 10/18/2025 2:14:19 PM (No. 2018546)
The UN can't tax anything.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)