Tylenol and Autism: More to the Story
American Thinker,
by
Joan Swirsky
Original Article
Posted By: Mercedes44,
10/11/2025 2:25:12 PM
In 2020, the Atlanta-based U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said that one in 36 children (approximately four percent of boys and one percent of girls) was estimated to have autism-spectrum disorder, estimates that were significantly higher than those in all previous years.
But just five years later, according to the press conference held just weeks ago on September 22, President Trump — in the presence of U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz —
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
earlybird 10/11/2025 3:05:47 PM (No. 2015515)
Long-winded Swirsky's meandering articles ,make my head hurt
11 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
czechlist 10/11/2025 4:34:57 PM (No. 2015529)
I was recently talking with a young woman with an autistic child. She related that when she was pregnant with him she would get regular sonograms in order to allay her fears about the fetus' development.
22 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
DVC 10/11/2025 4:58:15 PM (No. 2015534)
An interesting theory, and it would seem to be a reasonable thing to avoid.
25 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Catherine 10/11/2025 5:09:27 PM (No. 2015538)
I doubt it's Tylenol. I suspect a red herring. It's the immunizations. A child in this country gets something like 70 immunizations by 18. That's obscene.
24 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
seamusm 10/11/2025 5:26:19 PM (No. 2015542)
Doctors get paid more for ordering tests and doing things - not for simply thinking. (full disclosure - I am one). So more tests and more interventions end up being done. Everything has changed o'er the last 50 years and I have reasonable suspicion that short-term safety analyses of all that is done/ordered may well be grossly incorrect. Who suffers? Our children for one. Autism risk has sky-rocketed. We are clearly doing something - or everything - wrong. Medical care providers need to rethink - EVERYTHING.
47 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
earlybird 10/11/2025 5:36:01 PM (No. 2015545)
I sn under4stand U/S if there is medical concern agbout the status of the fetus. Unfortunately it is often just a means to disclosure of its sex.
8 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
JackBurton 10/11/2025 9:03:08 PM (No. 2015578)
This is fascinating and I hope that it gets investigated. Sooner rather than later.
As to immunizations: To reduce the number of doctor visits, a single injection might contain 5 or 6 vaccinations--all of them weakened forms of a dangerous virus meant to trigger an immune response. In other words, 3 or 4 too many for a single visit. My brother advised his daughters of this and ONE of them would get the vaccinations at a clinic, just a couple shots at a time. No problems. The other daughter got them all at once and had some problems.
11 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Maggie2u 10/11/2025 11:09:25 PM (No. 2015605)
Finally, someone has questioned the use of ultra-sounds causing autism. For years,I've been saying that maybe it's the ultra-sounds being one of the main reasons so many children are autistic.. My children were all born before they were given to women as if they were Neo-natal vitamins, so my kids were never at risk.
13 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
ldb51 10/12/2025 12:56:07 AM (No. 2015623)
What if the presence of acetaminophen or other medication-related substances in the blood PREDISPOSES an infant to neurological damage by sonic or thermal bombardment? Can they find populations that use "Tylenol", but do not routinely get ultrasounds... and vice-versa?
Here's another thought: can we trace such medical-procedure-related brain damage as is being discussed to an approximate moment in time when the current spate of maladjusted and irrational 20-30 somethings were still in the womb? That is, when mothers, perhaps particularly liberal, affluent and hyper-concerned moms, were starting to go all-in on "special procedures" to constantly check on and "adjust" their birthing progress? Do we have a generation+ of immature neuro-cripples whose brains got cooked by the "Science", leaving them on the fringes of the autism spectrum, in some ways primed like a grenade, and unable to cope with the world the rest of us deal with every day? And, sort of as with the China virus and vaccines... were there people aware of this phenomenon? Just wondering.
11 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Red Jeep 10/12/2025 6:46:15 AM (No. 2015652)
Maybe what ought to be studied is why there was no autism in kids prior to 1960 or ADHD or any of the other behavior disorders of today.
19 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 10/12/2025 8:11:32 AM (No. 2015687)
I'd like to hear real story about the MMR vax and credible evidence that it too causes autism.
10 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Strike3 10/12/2025 8:25:54 AM (No. 2015705)
Humans are born with an immune system that is superior to anything that doctors can put into our bodies. Unfortunately that does not create profits for doctors, hospitals and Big Pharma. I have avoided every vaccine in my life that was not mandatory, never get a flu shot and enjoy the blessings of good health.
16 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
MSUDoc 10/12/2025 8:41:53 AM (No. 2015712)
#5, I'm a doc and we don't get "more money for ordering tests" and I personally get nothing for ordering immunizations. That is a vicious lie.
We sometimes order things to defend ourselves against potential lawsuits if something is missed, but zero profit comes to me.
There are plenty of bad apples in the profession, but broadbrush negative statements like this further erode the trust in physicians that it appears many of the same people who decry it are actively trying to undermine.
13 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
anniebc 10/12/2025 8:43:56 AM (No. 2015713)
Amen, posters 5 and 12. Humans are fearfully and wonderfully made, and the do-no-harm folks do more harm than good to the average patient. I've found RNs to be better than GPs. I self diagnose because that's mostly what I do when I go to the doctor. I tell them what's wrong with me, they order tests, and I'm usually right.
I'm asthmatic. During a visit with my pulmonologist, I asked him why he prescribed my concoction of meds. He said it was what my insurance would pay for. I hit the roof! Not the best meds for me, but what my insurance would pay for. Another question I ponder is why there are so many asthmatics. I'm sure there are far too many factors to consider for this one, but no one seems to be able to explain why we have asthma, and there is no cure, so we're always spending money for meds and always in the doctor's office.
Nobody seems to understand what poster 7 wrote about immunizations and flu shots. A little bit of what you're supposed to be avoiding to see how you might react which can be influenced by so many other factors at the time of the jabs. No flu jabs here either, even with asthma. Nope!
9 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
chillijilli 10/12/2025 9:49:11 AM (No. 2015731)
It's a fact that the dramatic rise in autism incidence coincides with the rapid growth of wireless technologies. Research scientists in other countries publicly warn pregnant women and small children (with still-developing brains) to minimize their exposure to laptops, cell phones, wifi routers, or bluetooth.
The US tech leaders claim that no EMF cause and effect has been found. But what they're NOT telling us is that there is no data available to link the two because we are NOT researching the potential correlation---as other countries are.
Hmmm. I wonder why.
10 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
czechlist 10/12/2025 9:52:36 AM (No. 2015732)
#14 has prompted a second comment.
I was born in 1950 and grew up with severe air pollution and ubiquitous tobacco use. Yet of the hundreds of family, friends, classmates...I only knew one person with asthma, a high school friend's younger brother, in the late 1960s.
I began noticing more asthma afflicted in the 1990s. Perhaps it is merely anecdotal but it seems with cleaner air (supposedly) the affliction increased.
That said, I'd still wager more on food additive cause.
9 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 10/12/2025 10:03:54 AM (No. 2015735)
Lots of words in a hopeless search of a story! Word Salad by Kamala's next of kin?
5 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
NotaBene 10/12/2025 6:09:54 PM (No. 2015840)
Ultrasound worth exploring. Interesting that white women have more incidence of autism than minorities with fewer sonograms.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Mercedes44"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)