Anonymous Federal Judges Go To War Against
the Supreme Court
Front Page Magazine,
by
Daniel Greenfield
Original Article
Posted By: franco,
9/5/2025 10:46:05 AM
Have federal district judges peaked? Democrat judges, especially Biden judges, have been issuing insane rulings trying to stop President Trump from doing pretty much anything. These rulings are so bad that even Justice Kagan, hardly a Trump pal, was baffled by them.
I’ve argued that these rulings are literal lawfare, there’s no pretense that these various blocks are even legal, they’re there to force Trump to go to the Supreme Court. And then the Supreme Court, especially its weakest man, Chief Justice Roberts to mull over what the cocktail party set will say and cringe over being accused of being a rubber stamp for Trump.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Nimby 9/5/2025 11:33:53 AM (No. 1999831)
Anonymous Federal Judge? Anonymous? Justice should be blind, but not the judges!!
53 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 9/5/2025 11:41:59 AM (No. 1999837)
A few days ago, some judge made a ruling and their comments sounded like they were reciting lefty talking points. Biden admin was hiring activists to be judges. They really shouldn't even be in these positions. They aren't judges.
56 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
dwa 9/5/2025 11:54:31 AM (No. 1999839)
Interesting, these leftist judges are complaining that SCOTUS is doing what they themselves are doing and is impeeding their lawfare. But, that is exactly what the Left does. Also, one has to question whether these judges even exist since NBC is not knows for its honesty and integrity.
34 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
jeffkinnh 9/5/2025 12:04:37 PM (No. 1999840)
" It’s a war against the Supreme Court, the Constitution and the rule of law."
Leftist judges believe they are empowered to make up law as they go along. Written and approved law, including the Constitution, is only a weak guideline to be set aside at their whim. Unfortunately, they have been getting away with this for decades. It came into focus with allowing abortion at a federal level, an authority NOT granted in the Constitution. This SCOTUS corrected that error and continues to dial back federal overreach. The Left is getting more and more desperate. Their propaganda media is trying to stir up resistance.
The Left is attacking the Constitution, stating that the reference to "God given rights" is similar to Iranian religious philosophy and therefore very dangerous. Of course this is insane but the Left is desperate to break the Constitution and all that flows from it so that they can do whatever they want.
The reality is that law by judicial whim is no law at all. How can any citizen know if they are "breaking" the law when it is "created from whole cloth" only when you are pulled into court. How do you know if you are speeding if there are no set speed limits. Even if there are and you are obeying them, what happens when a judge, by whim, decides he doesn't agree with the set limit and fines you anyway? It would be chaos. The message would be, don't get noticed by the State because they will ruin you, one way or another. This is how Socialist countries work.
40 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
CactusStar 9/5/2025 12:06:22 PM (No. 1999843)
What law schools did these judges go to, Tobago?
17 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
franco 9/5/2025 12:34:16 PM (No. 1999852)
#5: Had that thought myself. And my conclusion was... the bottom of a Cracker Jack box. But Tobago works just as well...
15 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DVC 9/5/2025 12:37:06 PM (No. 1999855)
These anti-Constitution, anti-war 'judges' need to be impeached for violating their oath to uphold the Constitution.
37 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DVC 9/5/2025 12:39:02 PM (No. 1999856)
Anti-law......darned phone!
I typed law, got war.
8 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Quigley 9/5/2025 12:56:45 PM (No. 1999866)
Another "anonymous sources" story from the Loot America crowd. Did any judges really talk to Nothing Butt Crack?
8 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 9/5/2025 1:43:44 PM (No. 1999885)
While I understand the comment about forcing Trump administration to go to the Supreme Court, and it's likely Justice Roberts is uncomfortable with many of these types of cases, I don't see it the same as the writer.
I see it as a continuation of the non-peaceful transition that was launched by the Obama administration back in 2016 with the intent to obstruct and slow any progress President Trump could have.
It also ties his administration up to prevent them from finding the files that would uncover many of the events crafted against the Trump campaign, the Hillary email server scandal, etc...
The lawfare campaign is also designed to push against the massive government build up under Obama and Biden but also includes Trump 1.0 since they were pretty successful in maintaining the high level of government employment his first term.
Let's hope SCOTUS finds the means to shut these activist judges down, and soon.
21 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Venturer 9/5/2025 2:17:03 PM (No. 1999897)
Justice Roberts it's weakest man. No man at all in my mind
14 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
danu 9/5/2025 3:33:20 PM (No. 1999916)
F TA....Chief Justice Roberts to mull over what the cocktail party set will say and cringe over
being accused of being a rubber stamp for Trump.
this is all about roberts and the boytoy abbynormal whom he visits at his castle in transylvania
for bloody marys.
it's the mess they made ... cos they want to make it.
they yammer over cocktails about powerplays for impeaching pdt v.75.2.
how about getting rid of these 2 vampyrs in black, and their bug-eating slaves--PDQ
5 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec 9/5/2025 9:21:58 PM (No. 2000021)
Lower court judges are ignoring SC rulings because they know the Senate does not have 67 votes to throw them out should any of them be impeached by the House.
13 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
MickTurn 9/6/2025 12:51:12 AM (No. 2000070)
Time to arrest these Criminal Judges and hang them...of course after a SPEEDY TRIAL...1 minute!
7 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
DCGIRL 9/6/2025 5:48:29 AM (No. 2000088)
Calling Speaker Johnson...where are you? It is time to begin impeachment proceedings and get these guys off the bench.
11 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
5 handicap 9/6/2025 6:01:01 AM (No. 2000091)
The supremes, if they actually pretend to have a modicum of integrity, will disqualify Fed District Judges from issuing nationwide bans in any form and for any reason! Only the Supreme Court, should be able to countermand a Presidential Action or Declaration.
10 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
LLAMA 9/6/2025 7:16:46 AM (No. 2000101)
The federal judicial system is a mess, and badly needs changes at all levels below SCOTUS. Begin with imposing some kind of term limitation, and some kind of performance review process that will penalize political decisions and downright incompetence. What is happening now is nothing short of governance by judicial fiat, and it has to stop if our constitutional republic is to survive.
7 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Strike3 9/6/2025 7:51:11 AM (No. 2000115)
It becomes easier every day to recognize the Obama and Biden-appointed judges. They are the activist fools who spent their college years smoking pot.
7 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
BarryNo 9/6/2025 8:10:13 AM (No. 2000120)
Maybe NOW, Robert's will start acting like a Chief Justice? These whiny babies are denigrating HIS court.
If not he should just retire and let someone else with some Gravitas step in... As well as find another dependable Constitutionality.
4 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Krause 9/6/2025 8:55:34 AM (No. 2000148)
the Founders said, for this self government to work, that the people need to be educated and moral. We have way too many crooks in high places.
6 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Zigrid 9/6/2025 9:30:54 AM (No. 2000170)
Are you suggesting that Justice Ethel Merman is suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome ?....well...I agree...and Justice Roberts is on someone's payroll besides ours....he's very political and has always been so....he rules how he is told...not how he knows the constitution would demand....for years Ruth Ginsburg made me crazy...but she ruled with her conviction for right and wrong....
4 people like this.
The modern day version of “Star Chamber”.
2 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
NotaBene 9/6/2025 1:04:57 PM (No. 2000265)
I am very happy that President Donald Trump appointed three justices in his first term. Elections have consequences. Heh.
1 person likes this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
danu 9/6/2025 3:26:57 PM (No. 2000314)
agree w/ 15. let's recall these commicrats are on the bench --Not cos pdt wanted them.
these losers are the dregs of the bar assns, dimparty, and senators w/ their paws out.
after 20 yrs of obummeroids, our judiciary is a stinking landfill of low IQ corruptocrats.
for xmas, pdt should find a payloader in his stocking--to shovel them onto the garbage ferry.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "franco"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments: