Voter Fraud: The Only Issue That Matters
in 2024

It's Do or Die time for the Rats. They're going to cheat like never before, right smack in our faces with the help of the criminal media. What do they have to lose?

Well, poster #1, they have everything to lose. Hence them being so maniacal, and dangerous. They lose, many could end up where they belong. . .in jail.

I blame the RNC and Republican 'leadership'. We all witnessed almost 4 years of total inaction despite the rank and file screaming about fraud at the top of our lungs. The scale of the GOP neglect can only signal one thing: they are complicit.

This is exactly why I'm not overly enthused about all the polling data, feel good images of energized Trump rallies, and horrible interviews with the moron VP posing as presidential material. I recall all to vividly 2020 when I saw the same lead up (albeit with a decrepit dolt hiding in a basement as opposed to the aforementioned moron) to a Trump "loss". I'll wait until the weekend after the first Tuesday in November until I pop the cork on a bottle of Champagne. I just have this sense of dread I'll be drowning my sorrows in a bottle of Blantons instead.

We can't trust Obama's Marxists to treat elections as they're intended--or with anything else.

Voter fraud is my greatest fear, too. Really worried about those overseas ballots. Appealing to heaven on this one.

This is tops for me too, especially after Obama and Biden discussing that they "still have time" when they were overheard talking at Ethel Kennedy's funeral.

We have time. For what?

Sorry, but I feel I should post again to provide the link where it was reported that Obama told Biden "We Have Time." I thought I'd heard it reported that O said "We still have time." Anyhoo, the lip reader is legit. cbsaustin.com/news/beyond-the-podium/tense-convo-rumors-fly-after-video-shows-obama-and-biden-talking-at-memorial-service-ethel-kennedy-professional-lip-reader

Fraud is the reason so many (biased) polls have things neck and neck with only a 1 or 2 point difference. That way there's an expectation going in by the public that either candidate could win or lose by just a, relatively, few votes. That means 1) expectations have been set and 2) the massive amount of cheating to win by a just a little bit can be reasonably explained away by referring to the 'close polls'.

To win, Trump not only has to win, but he has to win by more than amount of the fraud that the Democrats can achieve.

Every illegal vote disenfranchises a legal vote.

The only hope is that they won't realize just how much they need to cheat in each swing state. Trump should beat the drum of prosecution coming for those who assist in cheating in 2024, when the DOJ is under new leadership.

Voter fraud = illegal voting by some people. Election fraud = manipulation of an election by the govt.

Nothing will discourage me...I'm ready for anything the swamp rats throw at Americans...and they know it...that's why this last minute drive to falsify the voting machines and discourage President Trump's MAGA drive...it's down to the wire now...as WE see nasty Nicki haley want to join President Trump at a rally...awwww poor baby...she's feeling left out...the assassination attempt at Butler, Pennsylvania was suppose to take him out and install her as the RNC candidate...I truly believe that...and now she has to play catch up...

Voter fraud is Black privilege, unfortunately.

While not alluding to a deliberate means of voter fraud, am interested in learning what vote counting scanning devices do if encountering multiple inked-in ovals for an individual or specific issue on an absentee ballot. What happens to that page of the ballot; is that portion of the ballot rejected or is the entire ballot rejected? Asking the question due to learning that a local Board of Elections is advising voters who make a mistake on their absentee ballot to simply “X” out the wrong vote; ink-in the oval for the correct vote; draw a line from the wrong vote to the correct vote and initial the correct vote. IF the vote counting scanning device rejects the entire ballot that may contain the vote for President, that individual’s vote for President will have been rejected--the vote will be lost. The directive to “X” out, correct the error and initial the correction is acceptable for some legal documents; however, it is assumed a vote counting scanner reads either inked-in or perforated ovals and not language or symbols thereby creating a potential loss of a vote. The directive may be well-intentioned but wrong and, if wrong, may lead to loss of votes. Literature accompanying absentee ballots directs voters who make an error on their absentee ballots to call their local Board of Elections and request a new ballot. A voter called the local Board of Elections and was given the directive outlined above. The voter was apprehensive about vote counting scanning devices possibly rejecting an altered ballot and attempted to get an answer that included calling the Secretary of State’s office but was unable to get an answer other than to ask for a new ballot. A personal visit to the local Board of Elections was met with the same directive of altering and initialing the ballot; the voter held firm until a new ballot was issued. Again, insight would be appreciated from individuals with experience/knowledge of vote counting scanners.

It's the ONLY way that Kamala and Timpon can win, keep that powder dry.