Is It Time To Permanently Ground NASA?
Issues & Insights,
by
The Editorial Board
Original Article
Posted By: RockyTCB,
2/24/2026 8:12:44 AM
As NASA eases its Artemis II rocket back to the hangar for repairs this week – the second launchpad delay this month – it raises the question of whether this government agency should be in the manned spaceflight business at all anymore.
To say that the Artemis program – which has so far cost taxpayers more than $93 billion – has been plagued with problems is an understatement. It has been a case study in bureaucratic bumbling, one made more obvious when compared with the rapid advances achieved by private space companies such as SpaceX.
Here’s a brief timeline.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Skinnydip 2/24/2026 8:47:07 AM (No. 2072563)
Has there ever been any government run program that could have been better than the same privately run program could?
13 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
mobyclik 2/24/2026 8:48:34 AM (No. 2072564)
It would be nice if the government would get out of the way and let private business do the job. No one, and I mean NO ONE can waste money better and faster than the government...and that money they waste is OURS!
17 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
jdano 2/24/2026 8:56:38 AM (No. 2072568)
DEI and affirmative action took it's toll.
18 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
red1066 2/24/2026 9:06:11 AM (No. 2072573)
This latest problem is an old problem. It has to do with O-rings. You know, the O-ring problem that caused the space shuttle to blow up taking off in cold weather. Once again, it was cold weather that caused an O-ring to fail and cause a leak. One would think that somewhere in the vast network of engineers that designed this thing that someone might have brought this issue up. Nasa has a rocket design that works. It's called the Saturn 5 rocket. Did they use that design to create a larger rocket? Apparently not. They had to start from scratch and make a whole new rocket that has an old problem.
15 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
jayjeti 2/24/2026 10:12:04 AM (No. 2072603)
Obama did his best to downgrade American prestige including ending the maned space program; so, what kind of chit article is this, citing a few technology setbacks to warrant the question of banning it. I'm surprised to see people going along with America taking a backseat while China, Russia, etc., continue.
1 person likes this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
chumley 2/24/2026 10:21:56 AM (No. 2072606)
I dont know about NASA or Artemis, but I spent 43 years in government in one form or another. One of my biggest complaints was that pretty much anyone could make a rule or a policy, and nobody could or would rescind it. So we ended up with volumes of rules, many contradictory and all of which were inefficient yet had to be obeyed. I was never closer to being fired than the times I had to sneak to do my job because puppets kept throwing up roadblocks.
One of the nice things about getting new guys was that they didnt know the rules yet, so they could accomplish things.
5 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
NYBruin 2/24/2026 10:51:09 AM (No. 2072625)
Is it time to permanently ground NASA? Yes.
3 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
stablemoney 2/24/2026 11:06:00 AM (No. 2072634)
I don't think the government should be involved in any business, and should be permanently stripped of any check writing authority. Government checks should have to go through DOGE for approval.
8 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
jimkata 2/24/2026 12:14:13 PM (No. 2072658)
As a slight defense of NASA: Their budget gets cut, then expanded,then cut again. Hard to maintain a good program in that atmosphere. Musk does not have this concern. If the US government dedicated a percentage to NASA always, alot of these issues would get better.
Additionally Musk tests his rockets by pushing them till they blow up, then analyzing the faults correcting them in simulation, redesign, build and try again. If NASA could just blow up rockets left and right they would be better too.. Ask Texas how they feel about all that extra pollutant in their atmosphere.
0 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
BeatleJeff 2/24/2026 12:43:32 PM (No. 2072666)
I can recall several decades back my dad telling me that he personally knew the then-head of NASA, and that while Dad thought he was a nice guy, he also thought the dude was in the wrong position because he was a bean-counter, not a scientist. For me, it all played into the joke that was going around DC at the time which went that NASA stood for Not A Serious Agency. It was preoccupied at the time with virtue signalling acts like sending teachers into Space rather than focusing on safety and mission success. Seems not much has changed through today. Like much of the Federal government, NASA is stuck in the past, refusing to modernize or adopt modern improvements to the process, with old problems rearing their ugly heads, whereas innovators like Musk are surging ahead and getting things right. So, yeah, maybe NASA does need to be retired, leaving the mission to private entities who seem to know what they're doing, before we end up with another Challenger or Columbia disaster.
4 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
MickTurn 2/24/2026 2:40:27 PM (No. 2072710)
We had a saying for the Airborne in the Army.
Remember, Your Parachute is Packed by the Low Bidder on the contract.
NASA has gone into the toilet since their early glory days. It has to be the BAD Contracts they have, No One working for the Government/NASA has a clue how to build anything but useless paperwork!
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "RockyTCB"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)