Secret Service director Kimberly Cheatle
is blasted for 'stupidity' and 'BS excuse'
that snipers were not on the roof used
by gunman Thomas Crooks because it was
'too sloped'
Daily Mail (UK),
by
Taryn Pedler
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
7/22/2024 12:42:26 PM
The Secret Service's director Kimberly Cheatle has been slammed for her 'stupidity' and 'BS excuse' that snipers were not present on the roof used by would-be assassin Thomas Crooks because it was 'too sloped'.
Speaking to ABC News on Tuesday, Cheatle claimed that agents were not positioned on top of the sloped building, deeming it too dangerous - despite images from the scene showing Secret Service snipers set up on a sloped roof behind where Trump was delivering his speech.
Former Army Ranger Sean Powell was among those who registered his outrage with Cheatle's 'BS excuse' a rage filled tweet.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Geoman 7/22/2024 1:06:39 PM (No. 1763558)
That was one of the more flat 'sloped' roofs, that can barely shed water. Why believe anything else coming from Cheatle? I believe Cheatle actions were intended to at least facilitate the assassination of a former president and current GOP presidential candidate with a motley group of blended DHS personnel, including non-Secret Service agents, who intentionally failed to coordinate with state and local LEOs. A group of cub scouts could have performed a more meaningful sight survey, and planned adequate protection based on the obvious threats and sight lines provided by the structure from where the actual shooter perched, unmolested.
13 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
DVC 7/22/2024 1:12:19 PM (No. 1763563)
I think that there are other reasons. And it goes to "sources and methods" and not to put too much info out there, it seems that the shot that neutralized Crooks came from some unknown position.
I think they are being careful, not giving too much info away to future would be assassins. And in that sense, I'll agree. Too much info on details of security arrangements is NOT helpful for future protection details.
Unknowns often trip up would be assissins. We should keep some unknowns, and make it more difficult for them.
7 people like this.
Although it was refreshing to see the dems on the committee asking the hard questions, don't be fooled. Their concern isn't about "what has been" but rather, "what can be" with their gal getting out there on the campaign trail. Lots of white supremicists with assault weapons out there, ya know.
10 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
4Liberty2020 7/22/2024 1:34:55 PM (No. 1763576)
Crook(s) and Cheat(le), Biden's playbook.
11 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
preciosodrogas 7/22/2024 2:38:59 PM (No. 1763623)
They are there to keep the person safe. Period. They blew that assignment, to a level that is nearly incomprehensible: buildings that USSS should have had command of were not even guarded (one guy even sited the shooter with his scope reporting that their eyes met); the perimeter was by far too small; it obviously lacked sufficient and trained personnel; it lacked eyes in the sky; the lack of leadership coming from USSS to the extent there was no coordination with local and state forces. No one in the business can screw up this bad - and that is just the short list. They are hiding something, they are not protecting anything.
It is entirely possible that they are withholding information as a means to cover-up the truth as opposed to protecting procedures. After the CIA/FBI and most of the rest of the alphabet agencies, including the security agencies I find more of a reason to shine a light on what happened so that it does not happen again. I think that there is very little value in any bad guy picking up hints from an operation as mishandled as this one. I think it is more important that we learn what happened because there are rumors floating all around that are causing people not to trust our government. It seems to me that if they are afraid to provided an appropriate level of transparency they are admitting they cannot handle every situation - which is their job. No two situations are ever the same, and, let's hope, this one will never be repeated.
4 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
3XALADY 7/22/2024 2:46:08 PM (No. 1763630)
While I was watching earlier this morning, from her prepared speech she was reading out of a notebook, she said she had not shorted any security for PDJT and in fact had upped the numbers as they were requesting more security. What does she call the ponytail brigade that were with the security detail on Saturday? That was an upgrade from what he normally had?
7 people like this.
Your DEI pilot will blame the local traffic controller for not telling him/her/them what to do, when asked why there was a near miss on the take off.
7 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
padiva 7/22/2024 3:57:13 PM (No. 1763688)
Is the bullet that grazed PDT's ear the bullet that killed the fire fighter?
4 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
MickTurn 7/22/2024 4:28:02 PM (No. 1763727)
I guess the SS head Thug doesn't know about now Roofers wear tied down tennis shoes to maintain traction...
Her statement is like when it comes to reality DEI takes over and Stupid OVERFLOWS!
2 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DVC 7/22/2024 5:24:27 PM (No. 1763779)
Re #8, it doesn't seem likely. From the limited info that has been released, this serious competitive rifle shooter has paid close attention to what is out there, so here is what I have been able to glean. I think this is correct.
I have other ideas about exactly what happened from where with the snipers, but will leave that, it may be useful to future would be assassins if it were out there, so I choose not to discuss it. Nothing conspiratorial, just how the SS does some things.
There were three bleachers of people behind and to the sides of Trump, and a huge field of people direclty in front of Trump. There was one bleacher directly behind Trump, and one to Trump's right, and one to Trump's left. These two were angled towards the centerline of the event. It seems that the firefighter that was killed was in the extreme outer edge of the bleacher to Trump's right side, farthest end from the center bleacher (camera left in the videos looking at the podium), and the shooter was in that direction, too. So, the murdered firefighter seems to have been "uprange" of Trump, so unlikely that the same bullet that went past Trump killed him. The two other wounded people reportedly were in the near portion (closer to the center bleacher) of the bleachers to Trump's left, (camera right side in the videos)....which is 'downrange' of Trump, so the bullet very well could have grazed Trump's ear and hit one of the two wounded people.
Eyewitnesses in the center bleacher have reported three shots from the shooter, then a flurry of countersniper shots. This fits with the three or four videos that I have listened to, running each many times. And I have heard a lot of gunfire in competition, and you learn to count fast shots effectively.
I think the shooter put two shots very close past Trump, hitting the two people in the stands past him, and one wild shot pulled to shooter's left, which struck the firefighter. Possibly this was fired reflexively as he was hit in the head, jerkin it substantially left into the other bleacher.
The shooter was in the general direction of the big screen display which had the chart that Trump turned to point out details of...which saved his life.
2 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
rochow 7/22/2024 6:22:53 PM (No. 1763815)
But we are now paying for SS to protect this dumb cow.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)