Mann v. Steyn , Free-Speech Travesty
The Pipeline,
by
Clarice Feldman
Original Article
Posted By: Judy W.,
2/11/2024 4:08:49 PM
The headlines say Michael Mann has won his defamation case and was awarded one million dollars in punitive damages. This suggests that the jury found he did not manipulate the data in his hockey stick graph which asserts that global warming is anthropogenic—that is, caused by man— is so frequently cited by "climate change" proponents. That’s not quite the whole story.
The jury seems to have focused on the fact that the writers compared his work to another Penn State employee who had engaged in child molestation which the university had covered up. The defamation the jury found was not in the critique of his research
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
marbles 2/11/2024 4:16:35 PM (No. 1655614)
The arrogance of this decision , it holds up Fauci as a truth teller, it criminalizes free speech and dissent.
23 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
plomke 2/11/2024 4:23:56 PM (No. 1655623)
Well what did you expect from a D.C. jury?
No one in the District of Corruption can tell right from wrong.
Heck,even our Supreme Court justices can't figure out what a woman or a baby(fetus) is...
19 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
MissMann 2/11/2024 4:26:27 PM (No. 1655625)
What a travesty of justice. If you weren't already despairing of our future, this case should do the trick.
20 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
ThreeBadCats3 2/11/2024 5:02:40 PM (No. 1655643)
How can this be? Not only is Steyn infinitely brighter, funnier and wiser than Mann, he is absolutely correct on the issue. Somehow, the Washington jury resembles Mann in those categories.
16 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 2/11/2024 5:12:40 PM (No. 1655647)
A totally unjust verdict. The jury proclaims that Mann was so defamed by Steyn and Simberg that they should be punished to the tune of $1,000,000 so they don't do it again. They then turn around and say that the defamation was so trivial that he should only be awarded $1 in compensation. In truth, they only awarded $1 in compensation because they had to in order to award any punitive damages. It is a very easy thing to give away other peoples money. The jury evidently was in a hurry to get home.
12 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Digger 2/11/2024 5:15:29 PM (No. 1655650)
No lawyer, me, but would someone correct me if I’m wrong. I understand that the $1 compensatory award further obligates Mark Steyn to pay mann’s legal costs. This calls for the whole verdict to be reversed.
11 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
danu 2/11/2024 5:44:34 PM (No. 1655674)
i'm afraid i'll have to wait for the english-language version of this nut baggery.
perhaps by then there will be a court order to dismantle the dystopia of corruption and its
saturday night live ''justice system'' by then, whereupon all district jurors will get coupons for a
free stay at saint e's--hinckley wing.
7 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
czechlist 2/11/2024 5:45:15 PM (No. 1655675)
TMK after several years since a Canadian court ordered Mann to compensate Dr Tim Ball (RIP) in a similar case, Mann has paid zero, nada, nitz, nothing.
Classy guy
10 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
MrDeplorable 2/11/2024 5:54:29 PM (No. 1655681)
Beg to differ. As much as I like, admire, and respect Mark Steyn, his likening anything in the climate brouhaha to the scandals involving Pedophile Sandusky was not only extremely ill-advised but totally beneath the standards he himself had set for his particular brand of journalism or commentary. I repeat, I like Mark Steyn but he made a big mistake in doing what he did and I would hope he is objective enough to acknowledge that.
3 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Citoyen 2/11/2024 6:52:15 PM (No. 1655710)
Neither Steyn nor Simberg compared Mann to pedophile Sandusky. They compared Penn State’s exoneration of Sandusky to its exoneration of Michael Mann’s fraudulent “hockey stick.”
16 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Harlowe 2/11/2024 7:17:23 PM (No. 1655718)
#9~ Respectfully disagree that what Mr. Steyn wrote about Mr. Mann was beneath Mr. Steyn’s personal standards so there is no need for him to feel any sense of self-flagellation or issue a public apology.
According to a Wikipedia account (citing two references) of the Mann v. Steyn lawsuit, it was Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) blogger Rand Simberg who opined that Michael Mann’s “cover-up and whitewash” by Penn State was comparable to the Jerry Sandusky sex scandal. Mr. Steyn, in a post at National Review, “alleged that Mann’s hockey stick graph was ‘fraudulent’.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Steyn#Defamation_lawsuit
Mark Steyn - Defamation Lawsuit
Appreciation and blessings extended to Ms. Feldman for her continuous magnanimous and masterful expertise on behalf of people and issues that are decent and honorable.
7 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
pensom2 2/11/2024 8:43:35 PM (No. 1655762)
I'd love to see the court reverse the damages award as mentioned in the article and limit the punitive damages to ten times the compensatory damages, or $10. If not the current court, then the appeals court.
1 person likes this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
DVC 2/12/2024 12:05:00 AM (No. 1655877)
Mann is a fraud and a liar. Steyn is right.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)