Pants On Fire: U.N. Issues Another Climate
Report
Issues & Insights,
by
The Editorial Board
Original Article
Posted By: RockyTCB,
8/9/2021 3:07:09 PM
The United Nations issued yet one more climate report Monday. It’s best ignored. Of course the Democratic Party and its media department, always looking for a Reichstag fire, have weaponized it.
The hysterical responses to the Summary for Policymakers from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s Sixth Assessment Report were exactly what we expected.
“A Hotter Future Is Certain, Climate Panel Warns. But How Hot Is Up to Us,” says the New York Times’ screamer headline.
The BBC dutifully quotes U.N. Secretary General António Guterres, a member of Portugal’s Socialist Party, who said the report “is a code red for
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Northcross 8/9/2021 3:15:35 PM (No. 873196)
For the 37th consecutive year, the climate fanatics have said we have but ten years to save the planet from catastrophe. If they really believed this, there would be a total moratorium on Chinese imports since they are the source of most human generated CO2.
8 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
BeatleJeff 8/9/2021 3:21:20 PM (No. 873203)
More dishonest scare tactics from one-world bureaucrats with ulterior motives. They know where they can go.
8 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
bad-hair 8/9/2021 3:22:35 PM (No. 873204)
Apparently 3 choices of how it's all going to go to hell in the NEXT 10 years since the last 19 didn't turn out too well.
6 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
deerejon 8/9/2021 3:27:39 PM (No. 873209)
Blame the U.S.for all the so-called climate Change.God forbid that China and India do any kind of emissions control,that is so bad that you can hardly see your hand in front of your face.Let's not put any blame on them two Countries that are the worst in the world for Pollution.You want climate change talk to those countries.
7 people like this.
Remember, if 100% of the Paris Accords goals were met it would not be enough, per John Kerry.
And, they had a target date of 2100.
Of course, the only country that was likely to meet the goals, and who withdrew from the Accords, was the United States.
3 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
red1066 8/9/2021 3:43:02 PM (No. 873229)
It's the U.N., so who cares.
4 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
DVC 8/9/2021 4:07:06 PM (No. 873267)
I won't bother with this pack of lies, either. I read the first few with interest, but after spending time researching the facts, it became clear that the UN is of negative value in the world, a harmful institution, and their reports are garbage.
5 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
skacmar 8/9/2021 4:34:05 PM (No. 873294)
Just another "Let's justify our jobs" report by UN Climate Fanatics. Next year it will be giant glaciers are threatening tropical islands due to global cooling.
3 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 8/9/2021 4:50:16 PM (No. 873307)
I'll believe the UN when they turn off the heating/AC, forbid employees from flying, sell their fleet of internal combustion engine cars, and use sailboats docked on the East River for long travels. This isn't about climate. It is about power, control, and money.
5 people like this.
Was watching one of those Smithsonian Channel "Aerial America" episodes. This one was on Nevada, recorded in 2012. This being the Smithsonian, the low-water bathtub ring around Lake Meade was quickly pointed out and the narrator casually stated that scientists have predicted the lake could run dry as early as 2021. At least they didn't pin the then-drought on slavery in America.
3 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
bad-hair 8/9/2021 5:47:45 PM (No. 873352)
Last chance Kiddies. Act Act Act NOW or in 10 years we're almost screwed.
2 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Blackbird 8/9/2021 7:55:12 PM (No. 873472)
Very few organizations are more worthy of being ignored and defunded.
3 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
web 8/10/2021 12:06:54 AM (No. 873666)
They've been playing this shell game since the 1st IPCC report was released in 1996. According to Frederick Seitz, President Emeritus of Rockefeller University and Chairman of the George C. Marshall Institute, in his article, " A Major Deception on 'Global Warming,'" (Wall Street Journal, 12 June, 1996, p. A16), "key changes were made after the scientists had met and accepted what they thought was the final peer-reviewed version... more than 15 sections in Chapter 8 of the report -- the key chapter setting out the scientific evidence for and against a human influence over climate -- were changed or deleted after the scientists charged with examining this question had accepted the supposedly final text." The report does not reflect the conclusions of the scientists. It states the views and wishes of the policymakers.
Keith Shine, one of the lead authors of the 1996 report, explained the process as: (the scientists) "...produce a draft, and then the policymakers go through it line by line and change the way it is presented... It's peculiar that they have the final say in what goes into a scientists' report."
2 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
MickTurn 8/10/2021 11:45:59 AM (No. 874105)
The UN stands for Useless Numbskulls.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "RockyTCB"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)