BREAKING: Supreme Court
Lets Trans Students Using
Opposite Sex Bathrooms
Ruling Stand
The Daily Wire,
by
Hank Berrien
Original Article
Posted By: clayusmcret,
6/28/2021 2:47:16 PM
On Monday, the Supreme Court turned down an opportunity to reverse a ruling that permitted students identifying as the opposite sex to use the opposite sex’s bathrooms.
The Court declined to hear the case of Gavin Grimm, a Virginia female student who identifies as a boy who had sued the Gloucester County school board for stating that restrooms were “limited to the corresponding biological genders.”
Reply 1 - Posted by:
leonardo 6/28/2021 2:57:20 PM (No. 829417)
Since the unchangeable nature of DNA is what makes males and females males and females, being unable to reconcile that fact is evidence of mental dysfunction.
The SCOTUS had allowed those suffering mental dysfunction to make the rules for the rest of society, so that the dysfunctional can "feel better about themselves and their predicament." Your insane government continues doing its work.
50 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Luandir 6/28/2021 3:03:38 PM (No. 829425)
Supreme Cowardice on display yet again.
60 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
snakeoil 6/28/2021 3:06:42 PM (No. 829429)
Glad James Madison isn't around to see what happened to the document he wrote. The main flaw in our Constitution is the assumption that the Supremes could read.
37 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 6/28/2021 3:09:28 PM (No. 829432)
God has left the building. Suffer His wrath and be prepared for His hand to be removed.
23 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/28/2021 3:10:03 PM (No. 829433)
I read this twice and it appears that the Gloucester County rule stands as the SCOTUS refused to hear the case of the trans-boy who filed suit against Gloucester County.
Read it yourselves and see what you think. The headline appears to me to be misleading.
18 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Nimby 6/28/2021 3:14:10 PM (No. 829440)
Do they have unisex bathrooms in Supreme Court?
24 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/28/2021 3:14:18 PM (No. 829441)
Found another article that seemed more clear:
WASHINGTON -- A transgender man from Virginia has won a years-long legal battle against his former high school over its refusal to let him use boys' bathrooms when he was a student.
The U.S. Supreme Court Monday rejected the Glouchester County School Board's appeal of a lower court decision that found its transgender bathroom ban is unconstitutional.
https://abc7news.com/politics/trans-student-wins-bathroom-battle-after-scotus-rejects-school-appeal/10839985/
This fake man - still a woman - has now been out of high school for years.
15 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
rockeysroomie 6/28/2021 3:16:05 PM (No. 829443)
Common sense has left the courtroom. The judges are gutless wonders. I wonder who is getting paid off.
27 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
downnout 6/28/2021 3:24:12 PM (No. 829452)
Any chance a man can waltz into the ladies room at the Supreme Court?
23 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Pearson365 6/28/2021 3:27:39 PM (No. 829457)
The irony is that if Trump runs again, he’ll have to make adding to the number of judges on the SC, from 9 to 13 or 15, or “court packing”, a campaign promise. “I’ll get 4 or 6 more actual conservatives for the SC.”
Whoever advised Trump on his 3 SC picks plus 2 AGs was and still is an idiot
20 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Plex 6/28/2021 3:28:08 PM (No. 829458)
I fail to see a constitutional issue or a federal issue. Should be the state as in abortion.
17 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
DVC 6/28/2021 3:32:16 PM (No. 829461)
Women are going to have to protect themselves and their children. The courts and companies refuse to protect them from these crazies.
20 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
earlybird 6/28/2021 3:32:58 PM (No. 829463)
The former student, “Gavin” Grimm photo:
https://epe.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/e46a91a/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1415x960+0+0/resize/840x570!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fepe-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F92%2F71%2F054554d24666a5b5d83401549787%2F021921-gavin-grimm-ap-bs.jpg
3 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
planetgeo 6/28/2021 3:48:45 PM (No. 829472)
Once again, this Supine Court refuses to rule on the most basic of common sense issues, further contributing to the insanity and disorder in our country. Our constitution is being ignored, or shredded, daily.
14 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
curious1 6/28/2021 3:55:48 PM (No. 829476)
Ignore it and them. Refuse to comply. They aren't authorized by the constitution to make such determinations anyway, so tell 'em to pound sand. They don't have the constitutional authority. We run this Republic, not a bunch of mentally-ill sock-puppets. More citizens need to realize that.
15 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
kono 6/28/2021 3:56:20 PM (No. 829478)
Bathroom assignments should be based on ones biological sex, not on something imaginary like "gender".
17 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Califedup 6/28/2021 3:58:22 PM (No. 829483)
At what point do we all start ignoring all Supreme Court decisions which violate not only our constitution but also take away our God given liberties.
No part of the Federal Government is valid anymore. Totally infested and taken over by the communist death democrats.
Free America! Sic Semper Tyrannis! Thus always to tyrants"
12 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
daisey 6/28/2021 3:59:56 PM (No. 829486)
Three problems helping destroy this country-Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett.
15 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 6/28/2021 4:17:49 PM (No. 829496)
Wow! Justice Roberts isn't the ONLY one they have something on!
11 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
columba 6/28/2021 4:22:29 PM (No. 829499)
There are 2 sexes.
11 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 6/28/2021 4:35:13 PM (No. 829510)
Who is surprised? Anyone? Its a victory for insanity. And that is the new Constitution. Insanity. We are clearly in the System of Doctor Tarr and Professor Fether
6 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
red1066 6/28/2021 4:36:41 PM (No. 829514)
Is she going to pee standing up?
6 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
msjena 6/28/2021 5:02:51 PM (No. 829538)
Alito and Thomas are the only conservatives on the Court, it seems.
15 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
chumley 6/28/2021 5:25:44 PM (No. 829559)
There is nothing in the Constitution that even remotely addresses this. It is not a federal matter. The SC has no business hearing it at all.
9 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
mc squared 6/28/2021 5:39:18 PM (No. 829572)
More men following their children to the restrooms. I started to see that when Target opened them up to all comers. The dads wait outside.
This won't end well.
5 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
bpl40 6/28/2021 6:03:00 PM (No. 829603)
Bathrooms should be XX and non-XX. Anything else is plain denial of nature.
3 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
KTWO 6/28/2021 6:23:38 PM (No. 829621)
If you declared that you are both genders could you use both bathrooms?
Or can you, after the fact, just say hat you felt you were both genders at that moment?
3 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Clinger 6/28/2021 6:32:27 PM (No. 829631)
Well I don't .
1 person likes this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
SkeezerMcGee 6/28/2021 6:46:29 PM (No. 829645)
On December 18, 2014, the ACLU filed a complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice.
This case was first filed in Federal District Court in June, 2, 2015
Grimm graduated from high school in 2017.
In July, 2019, the District Court (The trial court) on a re-hearing (on remand from the Court of Appeals) found for Grimm on his claims on Title IX, and on his Equal Protection Clause claim in August, 2019 based upon Grimm's claim he had faced emotional harm from being forced to use the restroom assigned to his biological sex (female).
Cert. denied by SCOTUS, June 28. 2021.
Is this good use of money, attorneys, judges, witnesses, and federal courts?
3 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
udanja99 6/28/2021 6:57:21 PM (No. 829658)
Barrett and Kavanaugh both have little kids. You’d think that they would want to protect them.
10 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
FJB 6/28/2021 6:59:50 PM (No. 829661)
After seeming so good at the beginning, that new ABC (or whatever it is) woman judge has turned into a prog loser. Too bad.
5 people like this.
If you only knew how small Gloucester is. Surprised it is still alive.
We have become a nation of uneducated freaks and ferals.
7 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Venturer 6/28/2021 9:35:54 PM (No. 829785)
The same guy who recommended these cowardly Judges to Trump probably recommended Faucci too.
3 people like this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Ashley Brenton 6/28/2021 9:48:01 PM (No. 829800)
Why don't we just let this be a national ballot issue that only biological women can vote on? I will totally sit that one out. And let any female 12 years or older vote on it.
1 person likes this.
Reply 35 - Posted by:
MickTurn 6/28/2021 10:23:24 PM (No. 829816)
SO I guess it's OK to use their private restroom now...
1 person likes this.
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Muguy 6/29/2021 12:53:38 AM (No. 829898)
So much for Kavanaugh and Barrett.... I like Gorsuch.
It is amazing that there actually was a 9-0 decision just a week or so ago showing they can agree but the notion that this is a 'conservative' court is unfounded by fact...
0 people like this.
Reply 37 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 6/29/2021 7:22:55 AM (No. 830021)
Gorsuch wrote the opinion extending Title VII protections to transvestites.
1 person likes this.
Reply 38 - Posted by:
Bur Oak 6/29/2021 8:18:12 AM (No. 830106)
We have a supreme court in the USA, but it is not the Supreme Court of the USA.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "clayusmcret"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Those three new "conservative" judges must have been recommended to Trump by the same establishment republicrats who helped him fill his cabinet with so many backstabbers and leakers. They're definitely not conservatives.