Nuclear energy undergoing revival in United States
Fox Business,
by
Aislinn Murphy
Original Article
Posted By: ConservativeYankee,
4/30/2025 1:23:29 PM
Nuclear energy in the United States is undergoing a revival.
FOX Business correspondent Jeff Flock, reporting Wednesday from the site of a planned Natura Resources small modular nuclear reactor in Texas, said the U.S. has a "voracious appetite for energy" that nuclear reactors can help meet.
Natura Resources, founded by Doug Robinson, is developing molten salt reactors, a type of advanced small nuclear reactor. Its molten salt research reactor at Abilene Christian University in west-central Texas is scheduled to go live in just a couple of years.
Post Reply
Reminder: “WE ARE A SALON AND NOT A SALOON”
Your thoughts, comments, and ideas are always welcome here. But we ask you to please be mindful and respectful. Threatening or crude language doesn't persuade anybody and makes the conversation less enjoyable for fellow L.Dotters.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
snakeoil 4/30/2025 1:36:26 PM (No. 1942922)
At my alma mater there was a degree program in Nuclear Engineering and a small nuclear reactor. Then the Green religion hit and they both disappeared.
14 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
earlybird 4/30/2025 1:41:34 PM (No. 1942926)
France had nuclear power decades ago when I last visited.
Green has set us back and the wobblies about anything nuclear don't help.
12 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
franco 4/30/2025 2:14:50 PM (No. 1942948)
#2: France still has them, and it's fortunate for Germans that they do, because French nuclear power drives the heat pumps in Germany that keep Germans warm in the winter these days while the Germans lecture the world about how green they are.
Sadly for French taxpayers, who paid for those plants decades ago, their current President Macron handed them over to the EU as "European" assets (for basically zero payment)... and the EU instituted an Enron-esque bidding system for French nuke power that now forces the French to pay 8x for electricity what they were paying before the handover. However, a bunch of well-connected EU middlemen are profiting handsomely from this little venture in crony capitalism...
15 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Vaquero45 4/30/2025 2:31:06 PM (No. 1942960)
There should be small nuclear power plants all across the U.S. providing electricity to cities and towns. We should have been doing this for the last sixty years, and told all the so-called “environmentalists” and assorted “green” activists to pound sand.
For anyone who doubts this couldn’t be done safely, I have three words: United States Navy. They’ve been operating nuclear-powered ships and submarines for 70 years, and never had a problem.
33 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Msquared112 4/30/2025 2:31:22 PM (No. 1942961)
Great news!
7 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
DVC 4/30/2025 2:44:22 PM (No. 1942975)
We; need nuke power plants. I am, so far, unconvinced by these new styles of reactors. We have 70+ years of experience with our standard boiling water reactors, and we know how to make them safe and run them safely.
I think new reactor types are potentially good, but the tech risks are off putting, at least to this engineer.
2 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
bpl40 4/30/2025 3:30:33 PM (No. 1943016)
Today’s nuclear power plants are still in essence steam powered. Nuclear energy simply replacing hydrocarbons as source of heat. Only when fusion energy starts directly producing electricity will the ral power revolution begin. This will be done through’reverse cycltrons’ where a high speed particle stream is decelerated by magnets thus producing electricity at the other end. It will be efficient, safe and convenient as no heat will be involved. Then all the issues of today - warming, pollution, renewability, Chernobyl like risk of radiation will seem silly. The day is not far off. Until then - drill baby drill!
11 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DVC 4/30/2025 6:03:51 PM (No. 1943101)
Re #7, no disagreement at all with your points, other than to comment that fusion has consumed trillions in research funding over the last 60-70 years and so far nothing really significant has come of it. Oh, yeah, they can take an incredibly expensive, tiny capsule of tritium, about the size of the tip of a pencil and blast it with 5,000,000,000 of watts of laser power and get back 0.00001 watts of power.
I know that's not "nothing" but it's pretty damned close to nothing, and the "Mr Fusion" on Back to the Future movie is probably never going to happen, and if it does, it'll be somewhere around 2400 or so.
9 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
skacmar 5/1/2025 6:47:47 AM (No. 1943293)
A few years ago the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant was decommissioned in 2022. Now that all of the staff has moved to other plants or let go, there is a realization that the state really did need the electricity generated by this plant and plans are being made to reopen it. If all goes well, it could reopen by October 2025 . If course, NRC regulations and inspections could delay things.
6 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
homefry 5/1/2025 7:15:40 AM (No. 1943301)
As they should! Nuclear is the best available at this time. Cleaner, greener and most abundant.
6 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
BaldGuy 5/1/2025 8:16:31 AM (No. 1943324)
#4...thanks for pointing out the US Navy....we don't hear that enough...my kid was on the USS Enterprise and worked in the Nuke plant...never had an issue and could run for years on a few 55 gal drums of fuel. And was one of the fastest ships in the fleet....
11 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
planetgeo 5/1/2025 9:29:49 AM (No. 1943354)
Nuclear always was and always will be the best option. And the most environmentally ideal one as well. Smallest footprint. Greatest output. Least polluting. A combination of nuclear and natural gas would serve us well for centuries.
4 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
swarfer 5/1/2025 9:56:01 AM (No. 1943371)
Don’t get too excited. The world nuclear industry has experimented with virtually all forms of reactor types and they are well understood. The Chinese had the luxury of picking and choosing the best technology for their massive nuclear buildout, bringing on line four 1000MW reactors every year, over 100 total so far and they chose pressurized water reactors similar to what is in already in use. They have the added benefit of modern computer design, manufacturing technology and automation whereas most of the world’s existing plants were designed and built with decades old technology. The real issue for the US is construction cost, work delays, lack of qualified vendors and skilled workers, regulatory approval cycle time and well funded intervenors blocking the process every step of the way (think liberal judges), something that does not exist in China or even Russia. Most US nuclear power projects designed to reawaken the industry end up being government funded make work studies to barely keep the US industry from disappearing. I spent 35 years in the industry in the industry watching politics, mismanagement and public ignorance destroy the industry that once led the world. Think we’re going to have little nuclear reactors scattered all over the countryside? Think again.
6 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Zigrid 5/1/2025 10:04:22 AM (No. 1943377)
Are you all prepared for a very sexist statement?....I'll leave this matter to the strong white/black American men to figure out...I'll stick to making some cookies today...and doing some wash...asking my opinion on a matter I know nothing about is foolish...and quite tiresome....sounds very leftie/like....so all you "oh so smart" women who pontificate on all matters you know nothing about...have at it....no one cares what you think....
3 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 5/1/2025 10:45:04 AM (No. 1943414)
Watch the lefty media dredge up stories about Three Mille Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima. Here come the protests! They have been effective at deterring nuclear power investment for so long.
4 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
HisHandmaiden 5/1/2025 7:54:22 PM (No. 1943812)
Never made sense when the Nuclear Facility on the Pacific driving up PCH from Monterey to Seal Beach was ever closed…
TBIYTC
0 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
HisHandmaiden 5/1/2025 8:04:24 PM (No. 1943820)
And #13, you remind me of my MBA classmate in VA whose job was managing the Nuclear Reactor Cleaning Team … thankfully after Chernobyl.
TBIYTC
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "ConservativeYankee"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)