COVID Tyranny: Federal Judge Rules 'Public
Safety' Overrides Personal Medical Autonomy
PJ Media,
by
Ben Bartee
Original Article
Posted By: ladydawgfan,
12/30/2022 6:57:57 PM
A federal judge seated in Montana, The Honorable Donald W. Molloy, recently ruled that “public safety” trumps individual autonomy over what gets injected into your body.
Via PBS:
A person’s choice to decline vaccinations does not outweigh public health and safety requirements in medical settings, a federal judge ruled in a Montana case.
U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy last week permanently blocked a section of law the state said was meant to prevent employers — including many health care facilities — from discriminating against workers by requiring them to be vaccinated against communicable diseases, including COVID-19.
“The public interest in protecting the general populace against vaccine-preventable diseases in health care settings
Reply 1 - Posted by:
sw penn 12/30/2022 7:07:21 PM (No. 1367728)
“The public interest in protecting the general populace against vaccine-preventable diseases in health care settings using safe, effective vaccines is not outweighed by the hardships experienced to accomplish that interest,
Annnnnd, there's the rub...
Not safe.
Not effective.
Mandated by cowardly toadies.
52 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
JHHolliday 12/30/2022 7:16:32 PM (No. 1367730)
First of all, it’s not really a vaccine and it’s mostly ineffective. Now they say you need one, two, three, four boosters to work. The deadly side effects now outweigh any potential and overrated benefits. I am retired and can tell them to KMA but others are not so lucky. Funny how they never demanded quarantines, bath house lockdowns and intense tracing of the infected with AIDS. Might hurt their feelings, you know, so they let hundreds of thousands die due to political correctness.
34 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Citoyen 12/30/2022 7:21:58 PM (No. 1367731)
I would like to know how a federal judge is involved in a Montana state law. Unfortunately the writer doesn’t provide that information, instead he rants about the dangers of the vaccine. I would like to know who brought suit against the law and how it ended up in a federal court. I’m troubled that a state law, which to me is very sensible, can be overturned by a federal judge.
24 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
MickTurn 12/30/2022 7:22:56 PM (No. 1367732)
Well, in that case you da Judge need to get injections for Covid until you finally get so many medical problems you have to Vacate your seat. This decision is so bad I can't even begin to understand it, other than the likely fact that this Judge is a Democrap and hates Everyone but his Marxist buddies!
29 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
SALady 12/30/2022 7:29:38 PM (No. 1367737)
It's time for judges that forget the Constitution and what freedom means to be introduced to hot tar, feathers, and being run out of town on a rail!!!!!
32 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Sardonic 12/30/2022 7:29:45 PM (No. 1367738)
Clinton nominated, enough said
31 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Namma 12/30/2022 7:48:32 PM (No. 1367745)
Tell all the illegals. They can go first!
26 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
leonardo 12/30/2022 7:55:30 PM (No. 1367748)
“The public interest in protecting the general populace against vaccine-preventable diseases in health care settings" DOES NOT APPLY HERE.
The JABS are NOT "vaccines." PERIOD. The injections were, and have subsequently been PROVEN to be, NEITHER safe nor effective. IF they are THAT effective, why do we need BOOSTERS? The honorable judge would find a much more receptive audience in Canada or maybe CHINA, where freedom is already abridged by sheep, or is non-existent.
22 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Hermoine 12/30/2022 7:56:44 PM (No. 1367749)
Couple this with the disastrous abortion law that passed there (by referendum) and you have to wonder what the hell has happened to Montana?!
11 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
MindMadeUp 12/30/2022 8:00:56 PM (No. 1367751)
From now on: "It's in the public interest that X be prevented, therefore everyone is required to do Y, even if it kills them."
10 people like this.
Judge Molloy needs to reread his constitution and just get the heck out of the medical profession. He and others don't have the right to force me with my health issues to get a toxic poison jabbed into my arm. Not to mention I believe that this jab is the Mark mentioned in the Bible NT. God says woe to those who take this Mark into/onto themselves and I believe Him. Besides, the judge is obviously ignoring all the news that has been trickling out all over the world. This Jab doesn't protect you, in point of fact, it gives you covid.
15 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
DiegoDude 12/30/2022 8:24:32 PM (No. 1367758)
Lived in MT for 33 yrs. Molly is a liberal @$$wipe so his ruling comes as no surprise. Hope the AG appeals it.
19 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
justavoter 12/30/2022 8:27:38 PM (No. 1367759)
But, but, but….the vaccine does not prevent the disease.
13 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
paral04 12/30/2022 8:41:30 PM (No. 1367767)
Nothing like Commies in our Justice system. Every oppressing act for the "Greater Good". This is just wonderful.
13 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
GoodDeal 12/30/2022 8:52:25 PM (No. 1367776)
The only problem is that the experimental shot, aka as a "vaccine" does not innoculate anyone from catching covid or transmitting it to anyone. The notion that it does vaccinate someone against an infectious disease it the BIG LIE Your Honor. This judge is totally OWNED by Big Gov and Big Pharma.
17 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
rochow 12/30/2022 9:26:38 PM (No. 1367782)
What a jerk! I hope he gets his covid booster shots, after all they were the ones that made sure you got covid. Guess he can't read, or he would have shut his moronic mouthpiece!
9 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
vhs68 12/30/2022 10:03:05 PM (No. 1367795)
Doctor / patient visit.
Doc: Bad news, Pal. The science has changed again. New data shows myocarditis is a possible side-effect of the vax.
Patient: But I already took the shot Doc.
Doc: That's where we got the new data.
10 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Scribelus 12/30/2022 10:13:31 PM (No. 1367797)
“Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.”
V. I. Lenin
9 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
chance_232 12/30/2022 10:33:30 PM (No. 1367805)
And there you have it. We, the people, are no longer citizens with self rule. We are now subjects. The purpose of the productive class is to work and pay for the non-productive class. ..... And whatever else "our betters" can dream up.
6 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Safari Man 12/30/2022 10:58:25 PM (No. 1367813)
Blood clots! Get yer blood clots right here!
5 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
crashnburn 12/31/2022 1:33:33 AM (No. 1367863)
Whatever happened to "My body, My choice"?
6 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
DVC 12/31/2022 1:48:05 AM (No. 1367871)
Not ever going to make me take their shot. I have some shots of my own.
5 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Strike3 12/31/2022 4:39:35 AM (No. 1367911)
Go ahead, come at me with a needle.
2 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
mifla 12/31/2022 5:41:32 AM (No. 1367920)
If the judge forces someone to get the vaccine and that person dies, can their family sue?
2 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
5 handicap 12/31/2022 5:42:24 AM (No. 1367921)
FTA: "The Honorable Donald W. Molloy," Should be: the entirety dishonorable Hack Federal Judge Donald W. Molloy," It's becoming clear that the only recourse to garbage rulings by treasonous scum like Molloy is to bring back the time-honored use of Pitchforks and Bon Fires made of their homes!
2 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
anniebc 12/31/2022 7:19:34 AM (No. 1367965)
What if someone showed up at this judge's home with a toxic concoction in a syringe and told him that he needed to be injected for the good of public health?
3 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
franq 12/31/2022 9:20:09 AM (No. 1368044)
Rust never sleeps. Do you think this type of thing will go away?
If so, you probably drive an EV.
Prepare, pray, and gather with those of like mind.
0 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Right Time 12/31/2022 10:12:46 AM (No. 1368113)
MAYBE this ruling by Judge Molloy might make sense if we were forcing people to take FDA-FULLY CERTIFIED VACCINES, and not these FAKE VACCINES that have only "emergency certification,' are harmful. and do not prevent contracting or spreading the disease.
0 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
red1066 12/31/2022 10:43:37 AM (No. 1368142)
The ruling involved people who work in a healthcare setting such as a hospital. Having worked in hospitals for decades, it's probably the worst place to be if you're sick. Remember, every patient is there because of some health issue. If they weren't sick, they wouldn't be there. Funny how this issue is only an issue when it comes to the Covid non-vaccine. If the Covid shot actually prevented someone from getting Covid, then I don't think it would be an issue. Healthcare workings are required to provide proof that they have been vaccinated against a variety of diseases on a yearly basis. It not only prevents the hospital workers from getting sick, but it also prevents the patients from getting sick. Again, this whole ordeal becomes an issue ONLY with the Covid shots. They don't work, and they cause issues that are becoming well documented.
2 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Lucky5 12/31/2022 4:31:35 PM (No. 1368342)
Bill Gates or Soros pay off somewhere?
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "ladydawgfan"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Oh, like HILL it does!! If I am cold, I don't ask someone else to put on a parka! If you are afraid of getting the Kung Flu, you don't have the right to ask ME to get jabbed!! So bite my fluffy, pure blood arse with your ruling!!