What Are They Hiding? Democrats Argue
Voting Machines Too Fragile to Inspect
– If Investigators Touch Them They WIll
Need to Be Replaced – Demand Rudy Giuliani
Be Punished for Requesting Access to Dominion Machines
Gateway Pundit,
by
Jim Hoft
Original Article
Posted By: Imright,
2/9/2022 9:40:40 PM
Joe Biden got 81 million votes.
It really happened.Democrats and their media lackeys are so certain of this that they will not allow anyone to inspect the voting machines.** In Arizona Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs argued that Maricopa County would be forced to replace their Dominion voting machines if they were inspected by investigators. The machines were so delicate that they can never be audited. That’s weird?Also in Arizona election workers were caught on video deleting “archived” files before the machines were turned over
Reply 1 - Posted by:
SALady 2/9/2022 9:56:03 PM (No. 1067281)
I would ask if they honestly think that we are that stupid, but we already know they think we are stupid. They just have to look at how they blatantly cheated and stole the 2020 election to know how stupid they think we are!!!!
And since they keep getting away with evil idiocy like this, they are probably right...
78 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
davew 2/9/2022 9:56:59 PM (No. 1067282)
If the Vegas casinos told the gambling commissioner that their slot machines would need to be replaced if the officials audited their fairness, they would be laughed off the premises and marched to the state pen. Anyone who still believes that these people are not hiding a massive crime that rigged the 2020 election is either a total sucker or is in on the steal.
99 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
rytwng 2/9/2022 10:03:17 PM (No. 1067286)
It's doubtful Brandon got 50 million votes.
72 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
danu 2/9/2022 10:18:35 PM (No. 1067293)
Is that Legal votes #3 ??
or Tank Abrams sort of votes, and Karen votes -like Karen Fann votes in AZ.
They're pushing a million bad votes already in AZ-in just 3 counties!! Yet, Ms Fann is dancing around that, w/ her crony -the AG.
Any Az voters on the board that can tell us if these 2 are mcvain mafia?
20 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
formerNYer 2/9/2022 10:27:24 PM (No. 1067298)
Horse Hockey!!!!! I was a software engineer for 35 years there isn't a computer that can't be inspected.
Get rid of these machines NOW!
80 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
stablemoney 2/9/2022 10:44:04 PM (No. 1067316)
The election was Nov 2020. We have not yet seen a single voting machine. Very curious that would be the case for an honest election.
62 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Lawsy0 2/10/2022 1:40:17 AM (No. 1067376)
Too fragile? O gimme a break. These hardy little computerized thingamabobs have to be melted down and smashed apart to even go into a garbage dump. Then they have to be crushed with a car crusher. Fragile, my aunt Minnie! I'll have what they're drinking, bartender.
32 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
jasmine 2/10/2022 1:41:25 AM (No. 1067377)
FTA:
"In Arizona Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs argued that Maricopa County would be forced to replace their Dominion voting machines if they were inspected by investigators."
LOL!
It goes without saying that machines too fragile to be inspected would be of no value in the upcoming election. They're junk and will have to be replaced anyway.
Has Ms. Hobbs ordered replacements for the shoddy Dominion machines? If not, how can they possibly conduct the next election?
29 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
mifla 2/10/2022 3:49:38 AM (No. 1067399)
If they are that fragile, how do the voters use them?
31 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
FJB 2/10/2022 4:53:35 AM (No. 1067419)
The Marxist Coup continues.
27 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Trigger2 2/10/2022 5:19:19 AM (No. 1067428)
Those machines weren't so fragile as to change election results, but now, lord be hold, they're too fragile now to be looked at. Strange, isn't it?
26 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Rinktum 2/10/2022 5:57:27 AM (No. 1067447)
I continue to be insulted by the left’s opinion that we will actually believe anything they say. First of all, I immediately assume it’s a lie because lying is their first language. Secondly, this absurdity begs to be challenged. Too fragile?? I will tell you about fragile. Fragile described democrats who FEAR any inspection of these doctored computers because they know they know they were programmed to cheat.
33 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
chance_232 2/10/2022 6:00:04 AM (No. 1067450)
No.... they don't think that "we" are that stupid. They believe that the abccbspbscnnmsnbc vierwes are that stupid.
16 people like this.
Touch and replace
Sounds like the perfect plan!
11 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
F15 Gork 2/10/2022 7:16:23 AM (No. 1067491)
What aren’t they hiding?
14 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Strike3 2/10/2022 8:06:03 AM (No. 1067527)
That statement is an admission that the machines aren't foolproof, bullet-proof and tamper proof - but then China already knows that and China-originated ip addresses in their communications logs prove that.
17 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
mobyclik 2/10/2022 8:07:45 AM (No. 1067528)
They wouldn't dare come up with garbage like this if we had an honest media. As it stands, their lick-spittle so-called media puppets say ''You lie and we'll swear to it.'' Onward and Downward.
18 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Clinger 2/10/2022 8:09:46 AM (No. 1067529)
Poster #2 gets a major award for that!
This is great news. Despite my concern that the evidence has been destroyed this is conformation that there is indeed something substantive to be gathered from the machines. The old flack over the target thing again.
14 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
pixelero 2/10/2022 8:44:31 AM (No. 1067549)
LYING. CHEATING. CROOKS.
Who in their right mind would EVER believe such transparent LYING?
Fantastically, incredibly mendacious. Truly incredible— like not credible on any level.
12 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Son of Grady 2/10/2022 9:02:20 AM (No. 1067564)
We will assume the election was stolen until they prove otherwise.
10 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua 2/10/2022 9:14:47 AM (No. 1067582)
Get this in court in front of some intelligent honest unbiased judges where it will make a difference. Why is this still being argued in the court of public opinion?
5 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
bighambone 2/10/2022 9:18:29 AM (No. 1067585)
Voting machines that for any reason that cannot be examined or audited should never be used in any election, that’s just common sense. That also goes for any such machines that can be connected to the Internet.
16 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
marbles 2/10/2022 9:25:49 AM (No. 1067597)
Fragile ? Like butterfly wings ? This might be bought by the dumber than dumb dem base , but everyone else (including the people that said this ) knows that they're lying.
12 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Marzipan4 2/10/2022 9:30:59 AM (No. 1067604)
It used to be “Moe, Larry, cheese”. And now it’s “Mis, dis, mal”. Don’t you know by questioning election integrity you are now part of the heightened domestic terror threat? This is not funny as powers that be bank up paper and cement walls to hold in this puppet regime and gulag ones who do not parrot the narrative. What bothers me so much is if it was a fair and free election then no one should be afraid of being audited. So easy to stand on the rock of truth than to protect a paper castle from rain.
6 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
rikkitikki 2/10/2022 9:41:42 AM (No. 1067619)
Their response alone is a prima-facie admission of guilt.
Q: If this were a casino or poker hall accused of money laundering, how long could they claim that their internal computers were too fragile to inspect...and get away with it?
A: Mere seconds.
8 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
bigfatslob 2/10/2022 9:48:04 AM (No. 1067630)
I feel like a bartender, sometimes it's hard to tell if someone is drunk or just plain stupid. The cheaters have to cheat then protect themselves with statements like Dominion voting machines are 'too fragile'. Poppycock I say! MAGA
11 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
hershey 2/10/2022 9:53:28 AM (No. 1067639)
I argue democrats are to stupid to be anything other than, well I'd say ditch diggers, but I don't want to demean a good worker....how about a pile of Schiff????
6 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
VietVet68 2/10/2022 10:11:30 AM (No. 1067663)
Is it just me or do the democrats protest too much? It seems like any honest person would invite scrutiny to prove their innocence. There's the problem right there, I used the word honest and everybody knows honesty is like kryptonite to a democrat.
8 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
MickTurn 2/10/2022 10:27:13 AM (No. 1067691)
A total BS argument...Seize them and disect them...it's likely software and 'firmware'...
Firmware is the embedded code that controls the behavior of the machine, how it steals votes etc.
7 people like this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
cor-vet 2/10/2022 10:29:31 AM (No. 1067697)
So this is why Hunters laptop can't be inspected. It's a fragile piece of electronics, unlike the computers of pro Trump people, that an be gathered up by the DOJ gestapo and subjected to inspections.
7 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
justavoter 2/10/2022 10:41:35 AM (No. 1067730)
If this situation were turned around, the Democrats would just send in the jack boots, confiscate the voting machines, inspect them and tell the complainers to go to he!! and see you in court.
9 people like this.
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Kafka2 2/10/2022 10:59:59 AM (No. 1067759)
Paper ballots are a lot harder to tamper with than computer voting machines. connect the computer voting machine to the internet and you can download software to modify what the voter enters any way you want, then switch it back at the end of each day to cover your tracks.
To obtain the ability to tamper with paper ballots is to allow ballot harvesting and drop boxes where there is no over-site of who actually filled out the ballots. Eliminating voter ID also eliminates over-site of who actually is voting.
And,the excuse that the machines are so delicate that they can never be audited is hot steaming B.S..
9 people like this.
Reply 33 - Posted by:
DVC 2/10/2022 11:07:25 AM (No. 1067770)
Total BULL.
Every one of these machines needs to be given a DETAILED physical and forensic digital examination of all the software and hardware.
There should be NO POSSIBLE way to link to a voting machine electronically from the outside. NO ethernet, or wifi, or any other kind of an electronic wired or wireless connection that can be made under ANY circumstances.
"Convenience" be damned. This is NOT about convenience or speed, this is about ACCURACY and immunity from hacking and external control.
Frankly, I'm for the "voting machines" to be a plywood box with a couple of padlocks and a slot in the top and NO electronics whatsoever.
Dip you finger in the indelible "a week to wear off" purple ink, drop your vote in the slot, and leave.
If you can't make it on THE ONE DAY for voting, IN PERSON, then, too darned bad, you don't get to vote that time. Overseas military will vote the same way at their bases. NO mail in ballots whatsoever.
If it is important to you, MAKE PLANS to be there.
10 people like this.
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Zigrid 2/10/2022 11:33:03 AM (No. 1067802)
WE the people are not stupid...and all dominion machines should be replaced...now...before any more damage can be done to our country with fraudulent elections...the new world order dudes have pushed US to far...
4 people like this.
Reply 35 - Posted by:
wsdiego 2/10/2022 11:36:10 AM (No. 1067810)
How can these machines be reliable if they are so delicate?
8 people like this.
Reply 36 - Posted by:
law428 2/10/2022 11:39:06 AM (No. 1067817)
The criminal attempt to overthrow our Nation is Treason and it is a capital offense! Anyone and everyone willfully involved in this monumental crime needs to pay the ultimate price and it needs to be swift and sure. Every adult citizen needs to see what happens to those who willfully attempt our nation's destruction. This must never, EVER be allowed to happen again!!
7 people like this.
Reply 37 - Posted by:
mc squared 2/10/2022 12:02:56 PM (No. 1067834)
Do we even know where they are, or if they still exist? Criminals usually dump evidence in the river.
4 people like this.
Reply 38 - Posted by:
DrOstrow 2/10/2022 2:48:58 PM (No. 1067978)
Interesting point #37.
Are the inspection denials due to the machines no longer exist intact ??
Or are they just being kept to be used in the 2022 ( and 2024 !? ) election !!??
If there is ANY incriminating evidence on ANY of these machines, somebody
just raised stupidity to an art form. NO ONE can be that stupid and
ba able to remember to breathe.
1 person likes this.
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Speedypetey 2/10/2022 3:31:31 PM (No. 1068004)
And Dominion is suing Guliani, Powell and Lindell for libel and slander, I thought it was $1.3 billion each, but wait, the voting machines can't be evaluated? This goes along with Eric Coomer's pre-trial deposition being sealed. The rumor is Coomer was like the Colonel Jessup character in A Few Good Men, and did everything he could to almost say, "you can't handle truth". So the judge hid his testimony from the attorneys defending their clients. Corruption? Probably!
1 person likes this.
Reply 40 - Posted by:
dman 2/10/2022 3:37:44 PM (No. 1068010)
When I was the Election Site Officer at a 2020 early voting location here in TN, an individual whom I did not know showed up with a badge and task to "update" the Hart InterCivic eSlate Judge's Booth Controller (JBC) while the early voting was active. A check with the county Director of Elections authorized the "intervention", of which I was skeptical but then allowed to proceed. Knowing now the problem with these "updates", I should have objected stronger.
That "update" was done via an internet connection (the eSlate booths themselves had no direct link to the internet - I had checked the router administrative log), which should have voided the entire eSlate system certification.
Other issues I experienced with these machines over the 10 years I have served as an elections judge and site officer have convinced me that paper ballots submitted in person at controlled locations are the "least bad" option. A certified paper trail is essential. Controlled locations should not be susceptible to internet and/or VPN " vulnerabilities and technical problems".
(BTW: I am a retired MSEE with 50+ years directly related experience.)
A manual paper ballot system is not perfect (nothing involving human or artificial intelligence is), but it is "LEAST BAD" among current options.
2 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Imright"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)