Hirono: I Hope SCOTUS Pick Will Not Make
Rulings ‘Just Based on’ Law and ‘Will
Consider the Impact’ of Rulings
Breitbart Clips,
by
Ian Hanchett
Original Article
Posted By: earlybird,
1/27/2022 11:12:51 AM
On Wednesday’s broadcast of MSNBC’s “The Beat,” Senate Judiciary Committee member Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI) said she wants Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer’s replacement to be someone “who will consider the impact, the effects of whatever decision-making is on people in our country so that they are not making decisions just based on” the law.
(snip) “What I’m looking for is a justice who can be fair and impartial and who does not have an ideological axe to grind, which is what we saw — as far as I’m concerned — in President Trump’s nominees, including to the Supreme Court.
I follow national politics pretty closely, and I have for years. And never, in all my years as a political junkie, have I ever seen someone so unintelligent in such a position. AOC is right there with her, but she's not part of the vaunted, pretentious US Senate. Mazie Hirono is, and she's a total nincompoop.
54 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Moritz55 1/27/2022 11:19:32 AM (No. 1052550)
Once again, Mazie validates her status as the stupidest member of the Senate
52 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Thos Weatherby 1/27/2022 11:20:35 AM (No. 1052551)
How does Breyer feel being played?
30 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
downnout 1/27/2022 11:23:02 AM (No. 1052554)
Dear Mazie,
Law is the only thing keeping you from being tossed into the Pacific.
34 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
YorkieMom 1/27/2022 11:27:39 AM (No. 1052562)
Another idiot heard from. The trouble is too many democrats feel the same as Maxie.
22 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
EQKimball 1/27/2022 11:31:18 AM (No. 1052565)
Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury. If you disagree with the law that applies to this case, you are free to use your conscience and do the right thing as you see it.
16 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Scout Finch 1/27/2022 11:37:03 AM (No. 1052569)
Sad thing is, #6, so many on the left truly DO think this way. Like it’s good to make decisions based on feelings, not actual law.
23 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Maggie2u 1/27/2022 11:42:46 AM (No. 1052577)
It's still morning here in the Pacific Northwest and some posters here are making me really angry so early in the day. How dare you, sirs or madams, trying to take away the stupidest Senator in Congress label from my very own patty Murray.
23 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
DVC 1/27/2022 11:44:31 AM (No. 1052581)
You can't make up things more crazy than what they say out loud.
Hirono, you ignorant, hate obsessed cow, ONLY the law should be considered. If you disagree with the law, there are processes to CHANGE it. If you cannot change it - then we will FOLLOW the law, not what some black robed tyrant says.
17 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
mean Gene 1/27/2022 11:45:53 AM (No. 1052582)
The two houses of Congress, including her own Senate, MAKE the laws!
If she doesn't want "the Law" followed by SCOTUS maybe she should write and get passed and signed into law, new, better laws.
10 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
sw penn 1/27/2022 11:46:49 AM (No. 1052583)
So democrat senators believe we should be a nation of whim, not law...
Degressive thinking is amazing.
17 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
marbles 1/27/2022 12:11:19 PM (No. 1052626)
Rulings based on law,..........how archaic. Feelings, that's they way to go. No need for our Constitution if it's not going to be used. In fact, no need for law school . Going further, no need for laws. When you think the left can't sink any lower, they plumb new depths.
15 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
skacmar 1/27/2022 12:12:26 PM (No. 1052629)
If the Supreme Court does not need to make decisions based on the Law, why do we need idiotic lawmakers like Mazie Hirono? Why do we even have laws when we could just go by feelings and what seems right at the moment? In a normal world, comments like this would get Hirono booted from office in the next election. Unfortunately, the reality of today makes it where he comments will make todays liberal wokesters like her even more.
12 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
john56 1/27/2022 12:36:58 PM (No. 1052652)
In the words of that esteemed philospher, Bugs Bunny, "What a maroon!"
10 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
SkeezerMcGee 1/27/2022 12:50:37 PM (No. 1052664)
Most SC cases are decided without impact being considered, including most cases where the central issue is statutory interpretation.
However, Senator Hirono wants impact to be considered even if impact is irrelevant to the case.
Sometimes impact is relevant. For example, in the recent OHSA (COVID vaccine case) - which was a case of statutory interpretation - evidence regarding the number of employees who might lose their jobs was in the Court's record and was discussed briefly during oral argument.
Common sense suggests that the justices considered the potential impact on the SC itself when (shamefully) deciding to NOT get involved in the many 2020 voter fraud cases. Chief justice Roberts made a public comment regarding the possible negative impact (at least some) of those cases might have on the Court's credibility.
2 people like this.
To all you gentlemen who have made comments: Ms. Hirono made it quite clear during the Kavanaugh hearings that men should SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP!
5 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Jesuslover54 1/27/2022 1:57:07 PM (No. 1052745)
Aiieeee...!
2 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Starboard_side 1/27/2022 2:10:39 PM (No. 1052760)
Presume she is talking about abortion, and the impact it would have if Roe was overturned.
Yet, her own state of Hawaii was 1 of 4 states who allowed legal abortion even prior to the Roe decision, so she should not concern herself with how other states might handle abortion since her state will still have legal abortions available.
The other 3 states are Alaska, Washington and New York. Thus, 8 senators who don't need to be concerned about any change to Roe.
Add the others states like California, Illinois, NJ, MA, OR, and you start to realized most don't need to be concerned about the people in their states either.
3 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
hershey 1/27/2022 2:14:32 PM (No. 1052764)
Hey wanker, go back to your little beach in the Pacific and work on your Hula dance...we aren't the least bit interested in what you think or say...so just shut it..
4 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
cny 1/27/2022 3:14:28 PM (No. 1052813)
It's always a rush to the dumbest in that august body of morons.
2 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
lynngirl122 1/27/2022 4:27:43 PM (No. 1052864)
HUH???
0 people like this.
Hirono has to be the stupidest Senator,.... or is it Murray?
1 person likes this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
navybrat 1/27/2022 7:45:10 PM (No. 1053016)
Our republic is based on rule of law.
1 person likes this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Tet Vet 68 1/28/2022 12:10:24 AM (No. 1053279)
Dumber than a box of rocks....
0 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
mifla 1/28/2022 5:12:47 AM (No. 1053365)
Democrats are so funny. I could watch them for hours.
0 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
binar 1/28/2022 7:22:45 AM (No. 1053430)
Stealing the election for commie joe did more than we thought
It (depends on how he feels. maybe IT-HE-SHE...) was the dumbest
person in the senate. Who would have thought there is a contest
to fill that seat. As was said in the past "What a country" h/t Y.S.
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "earlybird"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
“Never mind the law…..” Dangerously ignorant and racist Mazie...