Ukraine: What Is in America's Interest?
Jewish World Review,
by
Dennis Prager
Original Article
Posted By: Hazymac,
3/15/2022 4:25:43 PM
As a result of the Russian invasion and partial destruction of Ukraine, the question "What is in America's interest?" is the question of the day. Specifically, how much should America get involved in defending Ukraine?
On the Left, the question "What is in America's interest?" is moot.
On the Left, "America's interest" is regarded as essentially a chauvinistic, nationalistic, even fascistic term.
If the Left were concerned with what is in America's interest, it would not advocate — and, under President Joe Biden, implement — open borders. It is not in America's interest to allow millions of people to illegally enter the United States.
If the Left were concerned
Reply 1 - Posted by:
stablemoney 3/15/2022 4:53:22 PM (No. 1100939)
I do not agree with supplying Ukraine with fighter jets. Winning would be keeping China on the fence, as they will go with the winner. To win, we need to reach a peace settlement, and let the Russian people deal with Putin. Xi is watching closely, so we have to make the ostracization of Russia so painful that Xi decides it is not worth invading Taiwan. I think the response Putin has received is much stronger than Xi thought, so he will wait until the winner is clear.
4 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
MDConservative 3/15/2022 5:25:00 PM (No. 1100968)
After reading this piece, it is evident Prager can’t identify a US national interest at stake either. He engages in the usual shaming and dismissal of those with whom he disagrees. “Evil” is a relative thing. And it’s not up to the US to intervene wherever “evil” may exist. That cuts both ways…remember that.
I’m terms of US national interests, there are none in the Ukraine. The Europeans are free to act on their own. Have at it, boys and girls.
5 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
ThreeBadCats3 3/15/2022 5:29:18 PM (No. 1100976)
We have such a weak and feckless government, without principle in either major party, other than a notable few. Unless Putin (and those keeping him in “power”), is actually insane, there will be no nuclear confrontation. If he is, there will be one regardless. This country is morally obligated to support Ukraine. Russia invaded them, not the reverse. You don’t see our government, such as it is, threatening by inference nuclear war if China helps Russia to obliterate Ukraine. As they will and are. Unless I’m deluded, most of this country, the U.S.A, endorse helping Ukraine. The ones favoring the “you are on your own” approach will at some point wish they had some stones. What goes around comes around, as they say.
0 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
msjena 3/15/2022 5:30:30 PM (No. 1100977)
This is a good article. Prager's views mirror my own.
3 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Miceal 3/15/2022 5:37:34 PM (No. 1100987)
None...
1 person likes this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
dickiedeeb 3/15/2022 5:51:53 PM (No. 1100998)
So how will the USSA service its debt when the yuan takes over as the global trade currency as it is inevitably and inexorably doing Is the USSA going to go to war with the entire world to maintain dollar hegemony That wont work Somebody will pay the price when the margin call from Hell comes due and as ever it wont be them it will be all of us
2 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 3/15/2022 6:27:03 PM (No. 1101034)
It should be in the interest of the USA to grow the number of free countries in the world. I don't say, "Democratic," because there's no such thing as a pure Democracy. Ukraine, per its Constitution is a Republic with a Parliamentary government representing the people.
Freedom should be the #1 export of the USA, not weapon systems.
2 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
MDConservative 3/15/2022 8:21:13 PM (No. 1101101)
#3 - Time to employ some brains and stop thinking with your "stones". What is "coming around" in the USA is evident, whether government by mandate, the open borders, the rending of our national fabric by radicals, a growing police state, an economy struggling, etc. Toss in a reasonable distrust of our election process. There's no "evil" in any of that, is there? I still don't hear expressed a vital US national interest at stake in Ukraine being expressed.
#7 - George Washington would disagree that "Freedom should be the #1 export of the USA." Washington was a strong believer in the determination of nations to have the government its people thought best. No one exported republicanism to the colonies. It took twenty years to evolve, after a failed confederation. The Revolution was not a war on monarchy, but on a tyrannical monarch. (We even solicited help from the French monarch and accepted help from various Euro nobles.)
Washington saw the United States as an anomaly, an example some might emulate. He never suggested we become the suppliers of freedom anywhere. He warned of involvement in perpetual alliances and foreign interigues. Was Washington wrong in all this? Is it our right to impose "freedom" wherever we see a conflict? How'd that work in Afghanistan or Iraq? Vietnam? Even in 1917 Russia?
Building a "free country" begins at home. We have much to do.
4 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
red1066 3/15/2022 8:54:46 PM (No. 1101143)
Or "What's in it for America". There, I fixed the headline.
1 person likes this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
ThreeBadCats3 3/15/2022 9:59:31 PM (No. 1101194)
Mr. MDConservative. Everyone, as we know, has an opinion, or at least the opportunity to. George Washington was happy to accept help from the French, although that was perhaps their last fine effort, other than the Citron, teaching the Russians and trying to teach me their fine language. And many nice songs. We didn’t have NATO then.
Nobody is suggesting a perpetual alliance. But perhaps even yourself would help your neighbor if his house were burning down. Assuming all you had to do was call the fire department or turn on a faucet.
0 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
doctorfixit 3/16/2022 6:16:34 AM (No. 1101363)
Wrong question. What is in the government's interest? In contrast, what is in the peoples' interest? What is in my interest?
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Hazymac"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)